Search for: "State v. Click" Results 221 - 240 of 10,728
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2024, 7:48 am by Eric Goldman
The only difference here is that, instead of Peninsula’s search results directly stating the name Peninsula, they include the part name. [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Click-to-Call Technologies, LP (2020)"; "Return Mail, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
* In a footnote in its decision, the Appellate Division said "Federal retaliation claims under Title VII are subject to the same standards as those of the New York State Human Rights Law and therefore highly instructive as to the claim at bar", citing Banks v General Motors, LLC, 81 F4th 242 and Collins v Indart-Etienne, 59 Misc 3d 1026.Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's decision Posted on the Internet. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
* In a footnote in its decision, the Appellate Division said "Federal retaliation claims under Title VII are subject to the same standards as those of the New York State Human Rights Law and therefore highly instructive as to the claim at bar", citing Banks v General Motors, LLC, 81 F4th 242 and Collins v Indart-Etienne, 59 Misc 3d 1026.Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's decision Posted on the Internet. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 4:22 am by Peter Mahler
All ten decisions were featured on this blog previously; click on the case name to read the full treatment. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
But officials broke "[v]irtually every promise" they made. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 10:31 am by Vin Bonventre
(click to enlarge for a better view)Presumably, only a few [read post]