Search for: "State v. Cochran" Results 221 - 240 of 321
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2009, 3:55 am
(That last part's for you Judge Cochran.) [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 2:31 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
DeJoy on religious accommodation in employment, Axon & Cochran on challenges to agency adjudication, Glacier NW on labor disputes, and (to some degree), Sackett v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:10 am by R.J. MacReady
Today the CCA handed down published opinions in the following cases:PD-1205-08, State v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 7:57 am by Steve Hall
Such questions about jury instructions are an area of legal dispute that has bounced from state courts to the United States Supreme Court and back over the past 20 years. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 7:37 am
  Answering one of the first questions about the importance of trade secrets, Cochran stated that trade secrets have always been important to her industry and to DuPont. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 5:06 pm by Jeff Gamso
"A pardon is an act of grace," wrote John Marshall in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
Most importantly, the CCA had previously noted in Moreno v. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 7:01 pm
 James highlighted the case of DuPont v Kolon - which concerned the Kevlar trade secrets (read about the case here in the testimony from Karen Cochran) - and recent cases concerning Chinese espionage (US v Xu and Zi, US v Xi and US v Chen) as examples of criminal trade secrets prosecution. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 2:48 am by INFORRM
The most popular posts of the summer covered a variety of themes: The Police Tip-Off and Cliff Richard – Dominic Crossley Phone Hacking, So they think it’s all over – Julian Petley The Perils of “Revenge Porn”, Part 2 – Alex Cochrane How Daily Mail Editorial Standards are still Falling Through the Floor – Tom Rowland Case Law: Cooke and Midland Heart Ltd v MGN: A seriously harmful approach to serious harm? [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 5:23 pm
Judges Price and Cochran concurred in the judgment without an opinion. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 12:20 pm
Machine-or-Transformation TestAgain, the Court of Appeals stated that a process is only patentable if it is (1) tied to a particular machine or apparatus, or (2) it transforms a particular article into a different state or thing. [read post]