Search for: "State v. Community Distributors, Inc."
Results 221 - 240
of 296
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2010, 9:28 am
Centillium Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 12:53 am
This post is about a recent federal case that addressed this precise issue.It's a civil case: Condux International, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
Without intermediaries, mass communication platforms such as the internet wouldn’t exist. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 10:23 am
Ltd. and Gree USA Inc.). [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 8:01 am
Playhut, Inc., 85 Cal.App.4th, 927, 934-35 (2000) (refusing to narrowly construe invalid covenant not to compete so as to make it enforceable); Dowell v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 6:54 am
He also regularly counsels clients on the protection, enforcement and licensing of their intellectual property assets.Selected Experience• Successfully represented the plaintiff in Yurman Design Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
http://j.st/qD9 The Glenelk Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
State v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 7:46 am
Relying primarily on the decision in Hugo Boss Fashions, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist) Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to BC… [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 4:26 am
Farah v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 9:10 am
In DKT Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 10:00 am
" [24] The state expressly states that such a user may not have not have protection within the laws of Michigan, unless there is a state or federal statute that expressly requires a manufacturer to warn. [25] Other states have also chosen to adopt the doctrine. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Innovationpartners) Europe ECJ: No simple test for bad faith trade mark registration: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v Franz Hauswirth GmbH (IPKat) Court of First Instance: Shells all too common in bakery and confectionery sector: G M Piccolo Srl v OHIM (Class 46) European Parliament votes for greater ACTA transparency (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) CTM fees to be reduced (Class 46) (Class 46) (Class 46) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (The IP Factor) (Out-Law)… [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 2:21 pm
Co. v Am. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 9:38 pm
Consolidated Edison Company of New York Inc et al (Docket Report) District Court C D California: For divided infringement, proof of agency not required to establish ‘direction and control’: Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 6:40 am
Hager v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 7:05 am
This week the Court released the calendar for arguments at the end of November and into December these cases are: Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 9:51 am
Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 11:45 am
For instance, in Smith v. [read post]
