Search for: "State v. Community Distributors"
Results 221 - 240
of 565
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2018, 3:56 am
Tao Licensing, LLC v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 3:24 am
Kohler Co. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 1:07 am
Duke and State of New York v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 6:37 am
Our Federal Court recently granted an injunction in Bell Canada v. 1326030 Ontario Inc. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 2:08 am
The defendant is a perfume and cosmetic distributor based in Italy. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am
Barnes v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 12:58 pm
Supreme Court in ACLU v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 9:21 am
(Google LLC v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 8:41 am
The Court based this conclusion on the clear language of the reviews and a description of the website, which communicated that it contained facts, rather than opinions. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 10:03 am
The finding that the seller had engaged in a "communication to the public" is, to be charitable, a stretch; especially because recital 27 of Europe's Copyright Directive states that "the mere provision of physical facilities for enabling or making a communication does not in itself amount to a communication. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 6:40 am
Coty Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 2:00 am
” The Policy Statement does state that a marketer “may include an indication for use that is not supported by scientific evidence so long as the marketer effectively communicates the limited basis for the claim in the manner discussed above. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 2:00 am
” The Policy Statement does state that a marketer “may include an indication for use that is not supported by scientific evidence so long as the marketer effectively communicates the limited basis for the claim in the manner discussed above. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 2:00 am
” The Policy Statement does state that a marketer “may include an indication for use that is not supported by scientific evidence so long as the marketer effectively communicates the limited basis for the claim in the manner discussed above. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:24 am
The tax, which is 24 times the state excise tax rate on beer, has received mixed reviews among constituents. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 5:47 am
In addition, an obligation regarding “the documentation and retention requirements of insurance distributors regarding advisory telephone calls and electronic communication” is expected to be implemented by way of regulation. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 10:58 am
For a recent example, check out McNeil v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 8:46 am
dominant, and the most worrisome ruling to the trade mark community. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 10:51 am
On 26 June 1997, in Reno v ACLU,[1] the US Supreme Court decided the fate of the Communications Decency Act (“CDA”), insofar as it criminalized the intentional transmission of "obscene or indecent" messages or information. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 6:18 am
§ 11-1201 states that a “trade secret” is “information… that (1) derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and (2) is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. [read post]
