Search for: "State v. Constable"
Results 221 - 240
of 514
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2016, 4:10 am
In Lloyd v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 10:59 am
On June 23, 2015, in State v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 4:08 am
And the 6th Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 8:00 am
O’Keefe v Caldwell (1949) Argus Law Reports 381. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 5:29 am
More recently, the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR in Zakharov v Russia stated that “the interception authorisation, … must clearly identify a specific person …or single set of premises”. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am
This was relied on by the Court of Apeal in Vento v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire ([2003] ICR 318) when it gave guidance setting out the “three broad bands” of compensation for injury to feelings. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 3:20 pm
Ken White reports today on the opinion in United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 12:27 pm
Ken White reports today on the opinion in United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
Lord Kerr is critical of affording the state a margin of appreciation where it has not properly evaluated the issues at stake. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 4:31 pm
In particular, MGN said the Court should apply the tariff for assessing injury to feelings that was established in Vento v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire. [read post]
27 May 2015, 5:28 am
State, supra (quoting State v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:00 am
The defendant relied on the judgment of Lord Dyson in the Supreme Court case of R (Lumba) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2012] 1 AC 245 [101]), in which he disapproved the concept of “vindicatory damages”. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:44 am
As Wikipedia explains, in most [U.S.] states a person to serve the process simply must be 18 years of age or older and not a party to the litigation.Most jurisdictions require or permit process to be served by a court official, such as a sheriff, marshal, constable, or bailiff. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:29 am
Giving the majority judgment Lord Clarke stated that S & Marper was concerned only with the position of suspected but non-convicted persons, not convicted persons. [read post]
8 May 2015, 7:00 am
Graughran (AP) v The Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland, heard 16 October 2014. [read post]
4 May 2015, 1:00 am
Graughran (AP) v The Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland, heard 16 October 2014. [read post]
