Search for: "State v. D. C."
Results 221 - 240
of 14,460
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2024, 12:07 pm
This would be a Scott v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
D. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:48 pm
For instance, 8 CFR 245.1(d)(2)(i) implements the technical exception under INA 245(c)(2), which precludes one to file an I-485 application for adjustment of status who has failed to maintain lawful status “other than through no fault of his own or for tech [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:19 am
In HTC Corp. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 7:56 am
However, in the case of Dong v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 7:49 am
” People v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Purcell Professor Robert C. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
They’d look for some little snippet of text in the Lanham Act; Scalia was a textualist but he could read a law in its entirety. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 4:29 pm
Bohon v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 10:19 am
Valiente v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 7:28 am
State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
South Africa contends that Israel has commissioned acts capable of falling within Article II (a), (b), (c), and (d) of the Genocide Convention by “killing Palestinians in Gaza, causing them serious bodily and mental harm, and inflicting upon them conditions of life calculated to bring about their physical destruction. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:56 pm
INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court of Canada recently decided in Ontario (Attorney General) v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am
See James v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Robert C. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
The most obvious class of examples, as I discussed on Monday and as I explain at greater length in the article, consists of so-called "percentage" plans by which various states guarantee admission to a state university to students graduating in a specified top percentage of their respective high school classes.For example, in his dissent in Fisher v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:13 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
(Art. 1, para. 16(d).) [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
State v. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 5:29 pm
Sections 706 (d) and 716 (c) of the Business Corporation Law (the “BCL”) both contain a “for cause” standard for judicial removal of corporate directors and officers. [read post]