Search for: "State v. Daley" Results 221 - 240 of 263
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 7:07 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
"Second Life Ordered to Stop Honoring a Copyright Owner's Takedown Notices--Amaretto Ranch Breedables v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 2:43 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Secretary of State for the Home Department v Pankina [2010] EWCA Civ 719 (23 June 2010) Khader v Aziz & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 716 (23 June 2010) Annulment Funding Company Ltd v Cowey & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 711 (23 June 2010) Sugar v The British Broadcasting Commission & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 715 (23 June 2010) AET Inc Ltd v Arcadia Petroleum Ltd “Eagle Valencia” [2010] EWCA Civ 713 (23 June… [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 12:36 am by David Kopel
 In a state v. state case, a state can assert the interests of its nationals. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 10:01 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Exercising the option given by the case of Daley-Sand v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 12:56 am
"Accordingly, Supreme Court was correct when it ruled that Daley had stated a cause of action for breach of contract.The Appellate Division then turned to the County’s contention that even if Daley had stated claim for breach of contract, it was untimely because an Article 78 action had to be commenced within the four-month statute of limitations.It rejected the County’s theory noting that "The proper vehicle for seeking damages arising from… [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 8:04 am by Rob Sachs
My hat goes off to my colleague in Pittsburgh, Bob Daley, who has handled this case from the beginning. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Eugene Volokh discusses religious exemptions of a different type, from mandatory autopsies for executed killers in Johnson v. [read post]