Search for: "State v. Dames"
Results 221 - 240
of 704
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2020, 8:00 am
Pohlman (J.D. 2021, Notre Dame), What Is Caesar's, What Is God's: Fundamental Public Policy for Churches: Bob Jones University v. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm
Resolved – IPSO mediation 08369-19 Miller v The Sunday Times, No breach – after investigation Resolution statement 07779-19 Wallace v Echo (Basildon), Resolved – IPSO mediation 07037-19 Foley v Mail Online, No breach – after investigation 06303-19 Hoy v Wisbech Standard, No breach – after investigation 06056-19 Baker v The Daily Telegraph, Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 05072-19 Smith v… [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm
Dame Frances Cairncross led an independent review into the sustainability of high-quality journalism in the UK which was published in February last year. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 10:26 am
OSU v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 5:43 pm
This chapter starts with Maitland on equity's development, sketches the American history, addresses the formative idea of equity acting in personam, and covers the current state of the fusion of law and equity in the United States. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:03 am
-Portland 1.72 $93,755 $54,500 Florida State Univ. 1.73 $81,159 $47,000 Univ. of Notre Dame 1.73 $130,589 $75,500 Univ. of Washington-Seattle 1.74 $109,405 $63,000 Univ. at Buffalo 1.75 $90,928 $52,100 Univ. of California-Irvine 1.75 $119,986 $68,700 Univ. of Akron Main 1.75 $73,756 $42,200 Michigan State Univ. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 3:43 pm
McKenna, The Normative Foundations of Trademark Law, 82 Notre Dame L. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am
The Court of Appeal (Dame Victoria Sharp P, Sir Geoffrey Vos C and Davis LJ) unanimously allowed Mr Lloyd’s appeal (with the Chancellor giving the only substantive judgment), granting him permission to serve out. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
Hasday* When the State of California and Planned Parenthood recently sued the Trump Administration over regulations implementing an abortion gag rule,[1] they must have thought they had a good chance before the famously liberal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 8:03 am
Schierl/Fort Howard Corporation Professor of Law at the University of Notre Dame. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:28 am
In England & Wales, Gina Millar (the businesswoman who brought the UK Supreme Court appeal of R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5) also raised proceedings, following the Queen’s signing of the Order in Council. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:26 am
Schiedmayer Celesta GmbH v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:49 am
On substance, U.S. courts have been deferential to the president’s authority under IEEPA ever since the Supreme Court’s 1981 decision in Dames & Moore v. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 10:53 am
In July, the Seventh Circuit issued a unanimous opinion in the case of Emmis Communications Corp. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 6:09 am
• Douglas V. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 2:18 pm
United States, even as it belatedly repudiated that awful precedent. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:46 am
Sawyer (1952), Dames & Moore v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 2:50 am
Covidien LP v. [read post]
