Search for: "State v. David Harding" Results 221 - 240 of 1,834
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  So is David Strauss’s theory of common law constitutional adjudication. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 9:02 am by Kevin Kaufman
Introduction States are set to receive $195.3 billion in fiscal relief under the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), equivalent to 20 percent of the annual tax collections of state governments.[1] With state revenues essentially flat in 2020 (a net decline of less than 0.2 percent), the greatest challenge for states may be figuring out what to do with it. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
  Censorship by judges, or by any other state official, is quite contrary to our tradition. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 12:30 pm
Bergey's Ambassadors contract was to start only after his Bengals contract expired at the end of the season.The Bengals sued and the case is now known as Cincinnati Bengals v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 5:01 am by Jeff Welty
The facts make for hard enough reading that I won’t recount them here. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am by msatta
Board of Education or how we got to Obergefell v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 5:59 pm
The Supreme Court heard argument in Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 3:21 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: At the Sixth Amendment Center, David Carroll discusses Monday’s decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 12:00 pm
The case started innocently enough at McNeese State University, a public university of more than 8,000 students in South Louisiana. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 12:08 pm by Eric Goldman
Authored by David Kramer, Brian Witten and Jason Mollick of Wilson Sonsini. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 12:52 pm by Rich Vetstein
This case is very hard to handicap because, as I said before, the courts as well as state and federal labor agencies have really been cracking down with the independent contractor law in favor of employees. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
  A number of commentators have found their Lordships “philosophical” opposition to statute hard to follow. [read post]