Search for: "State v. Duffy"
Results 221 - 240
of 348
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2011, 12:52 pm
” In Thompson v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm
Mrocynski, Cooksey Toolen Gage Duffy & Woog, Costa Mesa, CA, argued the cause for the appellee and submitted a brief. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 8:30 am
(See, e.g., Vistaprint; Easysaver Rewards; Duffy v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 1:06 am
In Duffy v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:31 am
In Duffy v Trendowen ([2010] SADC 152) the District Court of South Australia awarded damages of Aus$13,000 in respect of statements at a meeting of a District Council by the defendant alleging that the plaintiffs, as members of the previous Council, were corrupt. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 9:32 am
And that just covers the United States. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 3:20 am
Automatic termination from public office by operation of lawSchirmer v Town of Harrison, USDC, SDNY, 1999 WL 61843Foley v Bratton, Court of Appeals, 92 NY2d 781 [Decided with Griffin v Bratton]Police officers are public officers and as such a subject to the provisions of Section 30.1 of the Public Officers Law. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 1:25 pm
At issue in United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:02 pm
At issue in United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 4:10 am
Zipursky, Snyder v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 6:01 am
Duffy and Paul E. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 11:09 am
Duffy v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:20 am
The court recognized prior Hawaii case law (Winslow v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 1:10 pm
Consider some of the following posts we've made over the past 3 years: - Online Sports Ticketing Exchange Wins Dismissal Under Website User Agreement -- Duffy v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 12:37 pm
In the case of McKinney v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 1:45 pm
State v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 12:54 pm
Disclaimers often insulate service providers (see Duffy v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 6:24 am
Duffy summarizes that opinion, which Orin Kerr excerpts at the Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 2:17 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 1:43 pm
Supreme Court Decision in Bilski v. [read post]
