Search for: "State v. Dyson"
Results 221 - 240
of 273
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2010, 4:45 am
At the moment the range of tests for persecution on return is dizzyingly confusing: Refugee Convention – a reasonable degree of likelihood for f (R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Sivakumaran [1988] AC 958) Article 3 ECHR -”substantial grounds” (Vilvarajah v UK (1991) 14 EHRR 248) Extradition – balance of probabilities for past and existing facts (Fernandez v Government of Singapore [1971] 1 WLR 987) Extradition –… [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 4:19 pm
Claims for injunctions failed at the first hurdle in Napier v Pressdram Limited [2010] 1 WLR 934 CA and Author of a Blog v Times Newspapers Ltd [2009] EWHC 1358 (QB). [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 4:38 pm
Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson). [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm
RT (Zimbabwe) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 1285 (18 November 2010) – Read judgment The Court of Appeal has ruled that asylum seekers cannot be forced to lie about not holding political beliefs when returning to their home country. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 4:03 pm
Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson). [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 5:30 pm
Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson). [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:10 am
The Supreme Court will hear two appeals this week, starting on Monday 25 October with The Child Poverty Action Group (Respondent) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Appellant). [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 6:49 am
Lord Walker, Lord Brown, Lord Kerr and Sir John Dyson SCJ agree with the reasons given by both Lord Hope and Lord Rodger. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:18 am
The hearing of the appeal by the Home Secretary in the Article 3 deportation case of MA (Somalia) began in the Supreme Court today before Lords Phillips and Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Mance and Sir John Dyson SCJ. [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 8:16 pm
Lords Phillips and Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Mance and Sir John Dyson SCJ will hear MA (Somalia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department on Monday 11 October 2010. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 7:17 am
Buxton LJ, with whom Latham and Longmore LJJ agreed, stated that:- “The width of the rights given to the media by A v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 11:00 pm
TM (Zimbabwe) and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 916 – Read judgment Is it reasonable to expect an asylum seeker on their return to their home country to lie about their political beliefs and thereby avoid persecution? [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am
– All-Party Parliamentary IP Group (IPKat) United States US General On hiring an employee of your competitor: Bimbo Bakeries v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 1:57 am
Maxximmo AG & Ors [2010] EWHC 1872 (Comm) (22 July 2010) High Court (Patents Court) Dyson Ltd v Vax Ltd [2010] EWHC 1923 (Pat) (29 July 2010) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:04 am
In the case of obviousness in view of the state of the art, a key question is generally “what problem was the patentee trying to solve? [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 10:04 am
The case will be heard by a 5 judge bench consisting of Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm
This duty does not require the state toinitiate a particular investigation; its obligations are met by ensuring that there is a suitable system in place.[2] However, in England and Wales, the traditional style of inquest, as considered in the case of R v HM Coroner for North Humberside and Scunthorpe, Ex p Jamieson,[3] is a significant means by which the state meets this obligation. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
v) Is the Secretary of State entitled to rely on the defence of act of state? [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:30 am
HJ (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 31 (07 July 2010) - Read Judgment The Supreme Court has ruled that the government’s “Anne Frank” policy of sending back gay refugees to their home countries where they feared persecution is unlawful as it breached their human rights.. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:36 pm
In Baker v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government [2008] EWCA Civ 141, Dyson LJ, at paragraph 31, Sir John Dyson emphasised that the section 71(1) duty was not a duty to achieve the result of eliminating racial discrimination as such, or to promote equal opportunity, but a duty to have “due regard” to the need to achieve these goals. [read post]
