Search for: "State v. E. D." Results 221 - 240 of 10,441
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm by Kevin LaCroix
During the close-to-close trading sessions affected by a short report, defendant issuers’ stock price declined by 16.8%, on average, and incurred additional declines of 16.0% during the 90-day look-back period of Section 21D(e)(1) of the Private Securities and Litigation Reform Act.[3][4] Third, Rule 10b-5 private securities fraud lawsuits based primarily on activist short-seller research may not be indicative of actual fraud-on-the-market since the work product does not… [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 10:42 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Walker said the greatest baseball experiences in his life were pitchers' duels versus John E. [read post]
Judge Cannatoro disagreed, stating that the majority "ha[d] not provided any authority for its novel view that the legislature did not intend 'ordinary vehicle repair' to qualify as a protected activity. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 10:30 pm by Ingo Venzke
Notably, transport services lie beyond the realm of EU internal market law (see Case C-434/14 Elite Taxi and Article 2(2)(d) of the Services Directive). [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 2:19 pm by Norman L. Eisen
It is centered on the defamatory statements Trump made about sexually assaulting E. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:59 pm by Dennis Crouch
These Wands factors include: (A) the breadth of the claims; (B) the nature of the invention; (C) the state of the prior art; (D) the level of one of ordinary skill; (E) the level of predictability in the art; (F) the amount of direction provided by the inventor; (G) the existence of working examples; and (H) the quantity of experimentation needed to make or use the invention based on the content of the disclosure. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 3:02 pm by vforberger
Cooper Spransy Realty Inc, UI Hearing No. 09003831MD (17 March 2010), aff’d Piontek v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A person described in paragraph (a) or paragraph (b), or paragraph (c), or paragraph (d), or paragraph (e) of this subdivision shall not be removed or otherwise subjected to any disciplinary penalty provided in this section except for incompetency or misconduct shown after a hearing upon stated charges pursuant to this section. [read post]