Search for: "State v. Eady"
Results 221 - 240
of 285
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2011, 5:34 pm
This reflects the current law as stated in Chase v News Group Newspapers ([2002] EWCA Civ 1772). [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 7:17 am
We posted previously on Grant and Gleaves v MOD , giving a summary of the claims and the circumstances of the claimants. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 4:03 pm
” about the case of Saliyev v. [read post]
30 May 2010, 2:08 pm
” organised by the BBC College of Journalism and Polis at the LSE In the Courts On 26 May 2010 Mr Justice Eady gave judgment in the case of Brady v Norman [2010] EWHC 1215 (QB)). [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 1:57 am
Sahota Solicitors won the case, and defeated the Maharaj claim, before Mr Justice Eady in May 2010 on the grounds of “non-justiciability”. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
There are no adjudicated PCC complaints to report but resolved complaints include: Sally Low v The Independent, Clause 1, 27/01/2012; Mr Syed Ahmad v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; Mr Colin Philip v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; David Bret v The Sun, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; Mr Damien Collis v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/01/2012, Mr Peter Reynolds v Lancashire Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/01/2012 Karen Birch v Oldham Evening… [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:36 pm
I will begin by summarising the present state of that law. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
Bouchart reports: The landmark ruling stated that although the work of journalist Denis Robert contained inaccuracies, the thoroughness of his investigation and the public interest in the story outweighed the defamatory claims. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 3:00 am
There is a world of difference between illustrating how a powerful country like the United States conducts its diplomacy and a News of the World reporter seeking royal tittle-tattle. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 5:13 pm
The rule however may not survive much longer as its pre-determined outcome does not reflect the balancing of the competing values and Articles – under the Human Rights Act and the European Convention, as noted by Eady J. in his recent speech at the City University and see Sunderland Housing Company v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm
On 16 November 2011, Mr Justice Eady gave judgment in the case of Al-Baho v Meerza [2011] EWHC (QB). [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm
On Monday 20 February 2012 Eady J handed down judgment in Ibrahim v Swansea University (heard 13 February 2012)([2012] EWHC 290 (QB)). [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm
In finding for the Claimant, Mitting J stated “…The impression given by the postings to the ordinary reader was a significant and distorting overstatement of what had in fact occurred. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 4:09 pm
However, those early reforms were state-based. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 4:09 pm
Surveillance Privacy International has released a report: “Teach ‘em to Phish: State Sponsors of Surveillance” reviewing the approaches of governments to providing surveillance equipment to other countries. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm
UN member states asked the UK about ‘super-injunctions’, online freedom of expression and the defamation bill: “The UK’s representative at the review, Lord McNally, responded to the questions and recommendations regarding defamation and its impact on freedom of expression by stating that ‘his baby’ aimed to get the balance right between a free media and the right of the individual to privacy, and that it was regarded as a ‘good law’… [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgment after a public hearing in a media law case is outstanding: Kennedy v The National Trust for Scotland, heard 21 November 2017 (Sir David Eady). [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:48 am
R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2010] UKSC 29 JUDGMENT The Supreme Court allowed the appeal on the jurisdiction issue (Lady Hale, Lord Mance and Lord Kerr dissenting) and unanimously dismissed the appeal on the inquest issue. [read post]
