Search for: "State v. Eady" Results 221 - 240 of 285
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2011, 4:23 am by INFORRM
A secular judge must be wary of straying across the well-recognised divide between church and state. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:19 am by INFORRM
The judge stated that the court must determine whether there is a real and substantial tort by reference to the tort complained of in the Particulars of Claim. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
The Court of Appeal yesterday handed down judgment in the case of JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
  On 17 May 2010 Mr Justice Eady stayed the action on the ground that it would involve an illegitimate inquiry into issues of religious doctrine (HH Sant Baba Jeet Singh Ji Maharaj v Eastern Media Group & Anor [2010] EWHC 1294 (QB)). [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:01 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal today handed down judgment in the case of JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 10:30 pm by Adam Wagner
A secular judge must be wary of straying across the well-recognised divide between church and state. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:16 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights heard the application in the case of Mosley v United Kingdom. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
At paragraph 231 Mr Justice Eady stated that monetary compensation is therefore not an effective remedy for a breach of privacy. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:31 am by INFORRM
In Sands v The State of South Australia ([2010] SASC 340) the Supreme Court considered an application for a stay on the grounds of public interest immunity in an action for libel and misfeasance arising out of statements made in the course of a murder investigation. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
France v Freemans Solicitors & Anor [2010] EWHC 3291 (QB) – 15 Dec 2010 (Eady J). [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 12:25 am by INFORRM
Cambridge v Makin, heard 8 to 12 November 2010 (Tugendhat J) Pritchard Englefield & anr v Steinberg heard 19 November 2010 (Eady J) Wallis & anr v Meredith heard 29 November and 1 December 2010 (Christopher Clarke J) [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:17 am by INFORRM
In the Courts On 9 December 2010, Mr Justice Eady handed down judgment in Lait v Evening Standard (No.2) ([2010] EWHC 3239 (QB)). [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 3:00 am by INFORRM
There is a world of difference between illustrating how a powerful country like the United States conducts its diplomacy and a News of the World reporter seeking royal tittle-tattle. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:21 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Eady J has twice held that the defence of fair comment cannot apply where the defamatory sting is a matter of verifiable fact –Hamilton v Clifford [2004] EWHC 1542 (QB) and British Chiropractic Association v Singh [2009] EWHC 1101 (subsequently reversed by the Court of Appeal). [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Eady J has twice held that the defence of fair comment cannot apply where the defamatory sting is a matter of verifiable fact – Hamilton v Clifford [2004] EWHC 1542 (QB) and British Chiropractic Association v Singh [2009] EWHC 1101 (subsequently reversed by the Court of Appeal). [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
This is in line with one of the “limiting principles” in the law of breach of confidence, as stated in the Spycatcher litigation (Attorney-General v Observer Ltd [1990] 1 AC 109 HL) that the law would not protect the trivial or the anodyne. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
Berezovsky -v- Vladimir Terluk & anr heard 9 November 2010 (Mummery and Sedley LJJ) Cambridge v Makin, heard 8 to 12 November 2010 (Tugendhat J) Pritchard Englefield & anr v Steinberg heard 19 November 2010 (Eady J) [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am by INFORRM
” The judge clearly had regard to Ms Ntuli’s stated motives for wanting to sell her story (see, for example, paragraph 32 of his judgment). [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
  The three most recent full trials are Hughes v Risbridger (2010 EWHC 491 (QB)) Berezovsky v Russian Television (10 March 2010 EWHC 476 (QB)) and Gary Flood v Times Newspapers (16 October 2009 EWHC 2375 (QB)). [read post]