Search for: "State v. Ell"
Results 221 - 240
of 265
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(Spicy IP) Israel Registrar of Trademarks cancels car glass marks on grounds of non-use: Ilan Car Glaziery Ltd v Carglass Luxemburg Sarl (IP Factor) Japan Japan Patent Office releases ‘Examination Guidelines for Patent and Utility Model’ (Patent Baristas) Amendment to Japanese IP law creates new after final deadlines for foreign applicants (Patent Docs) Korea Korea’s Patent Court adopts ethics code (PatLit) Mexico … [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 4:34 am
J.R. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 5:11 am
The district court initially stated that `[t]here is certainly not evidence that there was a conspiracy. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 8:33 am
Lauzon v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 4:49 am
Elle s’insérait alors dans le contexte du conflit en Afghanistan, amorcé dans la foulée des attaques terroristes du 11 septembre 2001, aux États-Unis. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:45 am
From Dodge v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 9:12 am
So holds Monday’s Jones v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
The New York Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide contains resources for individuals with cerebral palsy within the State of New York. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:51 am
The propaganda strategy is not meant for the state apparatus of competitor states. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 5:46 pm
United States USA today had a piece “Rudy Giuliani’s ‘Borat 2’ scene: What can he do about it legally? [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 3:53 am
Article L.851-3 starts by stating that the processing should not allow the identification of individuals. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 9:25 am
(b) In the event of a negative response to that question and if other conditions are required in order for a competitive relationship to be established, is it necessary to consider the current state of the market and drinking habits in the Community or is it necessary also to consider how those habits might evolve? [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:55 pm
That also means that it will be as important for states to provide a means of training people to read and assess these reports as it is for states to develop the ability to produce them. 6. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
7 May 2020, 12:22 pm
Max-Planck-Gesellschaftzur Forderung der Wissenschaften E.V. et Beech Aircraft Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
United States, 445 U.S. 222, 227 n.8 (1980) (quoting Judge Learned Hand’s statement in Gratz v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 10:35 am
Leining v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:11 am
Le but qu’elle visait, soit la dissolution de quelques sociétés, étant accompli, elle n’a plus d’effet juridique. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:04 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 10:45 am
Those Progressives saw the administrative state as the sword of social justice, particularly in the New Deal era. [read post]
