Search for: "State v. Freedom of Information Commission" Results 221 - 240 of 1,703
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2012, 6:16 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Further, in a 2011 Joint Declaration, the United Nations (UN) Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) Representative on freedom of the media, the Organisation of American States (OAS) Special Rapporteur on freedom of expression and the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR) Special Rapporteur on… [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 7:26 am by Lyle Denniston
  The case, a test of a section of the Freedom of Information Act shielding records from disclosure if they involved “personal privacy,” is Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 4:08 am by INFORRM
The Court heard argument in the case of Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 1:47 pm by My name
• The Commerce Department has released a green paper describing a need for a “Dynamic Privacy Framework,” including a Privacy Policy Office, emphasis on transparency and simplicity of privacy notices, global cooperation and parity in information laws, and a federal security breach notification law, possibly similar to California’s SB 1386  • United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 6:15 pm by pfriedman
His stated objective is thus not to repackage Blanch’s “Silk Sandals,” but to employ it “`in the creation of new information, new aesthetics, new insights and understandings. [read post]
Additionally, the Federal Trade Commission has started to implement federal privacy rules for consumer data, citing “a need to protect people’s right to seek healthcare information. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:53 am
The event will mark the 50th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court decision, Miranda v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The EACJ could not find this scheme to be a violation of freedom of the press as such a limitation was reasonable and justifiable, as the National Communications Council could only act in the event of abuse by a journalist. [92] Content Based Restrictions The EACJ took issue with a number of provisions of the Press Law that unduly denied citizens of their right to information; most notably information that could inform their choices in matters of governance. [95]… [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 11:31 pm
In a detailed analysis of New York's Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) the Appellate Division First Department held that certain communications from a consultant hired by the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC) were not exempt from release under FOIL as intra-agency communications. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 11:31 pm
In a detailed analysis of New York's Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) the Appellate Division First Department held that certain communications from a consultant hired by the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC) were not exempt from release under FOIL as intra-agency communications. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
In Sweeny v Ireland [2017] IEHC 702 (23 November 2017) Baker J in the High Court struck down section 9(1)(b) of the Offences Against the State (Amendment) Act, 1998 (also here), which provided for a wide offence of withholding material information from Gardaí, on the grounds that it infringed the right to silence derived from the right to freedom of expression in Article 40. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 5:38 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Again from the Post:E-mails collected through a separate Freedom of Information Act request, by the ACLU, showed in June that the U.S. [read post]