Search for: "State v. GP"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,811
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2009, 7:21 am
That such a surrogate technological deployment is not — particularly when placed at the unsupervised discretion of agents of the state “engaged in the often competitive enterprise of ferreting out crime” (Johnson v United States, 333 US 10, 14 [1948]) — compatible with any reasonable notion of personal privacy or ordered liberty would appear to us obvious. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 4:54 am
Then, in April, he installed a GPS tracking device on her car. . . . [read post]
14 May 2009, 4:50 pm
In Does Technology Have to Trump Privacy Right,Nicole Black previously discussed the recently decided NY case of People v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:28 am
These three cases—as well as the majority and concuring opinions in the much-discussed GPS tracking case, United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 7:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 2:18 pm
(Orin Kerr) The DC Circuit has just noted on its docket that it has denied rehearing in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:46 am
(Orin Kerr) According to this morning’s order list, the Supreme Court has agreed to review United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 4:41 pm
(Orin Kerr) A report from the front of the line for United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 7:43 am
The SCOTUS is hearing argument tomorrow in United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 2:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 9:23 am
REV. 661, 684 (2005). 3 United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 5:46 am
Jones, the GPS Fourth Amendment Case by Orin Kerr: I was at the Supreme Court this morning for the oral argument in United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 6:24 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:52 am
In a rare unanimous decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled on January 23, 2012, in U.S. v Antoine Jones, that attaching a GPS device to a suspect’s vehicle is a search under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 12:02 pm
GPS devices are a LOT more sophisticated than the beepers used in these cases, which logically raises the question as to whether the use of a GPS device, unlike the use of a beeper, is a 4th Amendment search . . . which brings us back to U.S. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:33 am
See United States v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 7:59 am
The New York Court of Appeals today decided Weaver v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 12:38 pm
Now we have a Supreme Court decision (United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 12:12 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in U.S. v. [read post]
