Search for: "State v. Greenfield" Results 221 - 240 of 399
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
” In the latest episode of First Mondays (podcast), Dan Epps and Ian Samuel are “joined by Kent Greenfield and Adam Winkler, who both have new books about corporate personhood, as well as our bankruptcy expert, Danielle D’Onfro. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:27 pm by Carolyn Elefant
Contrast that kind of understanding treatment with the career-ending penalty doled out to solo Thomas Lindmeier, the Nebraska lawyer who received a six month suspension for trust accounting errors in State v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
Making Sense of Jones by Scott Greenfield in Simple Justice Since the opinions were released yesterday morning, the blawgosphere has cranked out a ton of posts about what the Jones v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 4:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
They stated that they understood and were satisfied with the settlement and with their attorneys’ representation. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 7:47 am by Ken White
Scott Greenfield has already cheerfully demolished Professor Rosenbaum's very silly column. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 5:38 am by Jeff Gamso
United States (which I've written about before) and you can read the opinions here. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 3:41 am
State (pdf) upheld the trial court's reasonable doubt definition, which was, according to the trial court, "a slight variation of the charge on reasonable dobut recommended by Justice Ginsburg . . . in Victor v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 12:50 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
When the United States Supreme Court issued Brown v Board of Education, southern states engaged in Massive Resistance against it. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am by Andrew Hamm
” Lastly, about Ortiz v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 10:34 pm by Jeff Gamso
I didn't write about how the so-called "public-safety" exception made up by the Supremes in New York v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 7:47 am by Jeff Gamso
  Ross was a volunteer (a term it appears that Antonin Scalia didn't know until oral argument in Martel v. [read post]