Search for: "State v. Grounds"
Results 221 - 240
of 40,828
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 1:58 pm
Doe alleges that he was the winner of the Maine State Lottery, that Ms. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:28 pm
United States (Treaty Rights; "Bad Men" Provision) Reges v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Nervo, J.), entered June 2, 2022, which granted defendants' and intervenor defendant's motions to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground that it did not present a justiciable controversy.Sidley Austin LLP, New York (Melissa ColÓn-Bosolet, Eamon P. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Nervo, J.), entered June 2, 2022, which granted defendants' and intervenor defendant's motions to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground that it did not present a justiciable controversy.Sidley Austin LLP, New York (Melissa ColÓn-Bosolet, Eamon P. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:51 am
Defendant sought summary judgment exclusively on causation grounds—namely that plaintiff could not show that, “but for the attorney’s negligence, the plaintiff would have succeeded on the merits of the underlying action” (Kivo v Louis F. [read post]
7 May 2024, 3:42 pm
” In light of Reeves, pre-trial suppression motions should seek suppression of identification testimony, in part, on the ground that the proffered testimony was unreliable and conducive to a substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification in violation of ... the Constitution of New York State and the United States Constitution and cited Reeves. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:19 pm
" Paul v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm
This flawed scope suggests no direct link between the law’s restrictions and the stated security concerns, weakening its justification under strict scrutiny. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm
This flawed scope suggests no direct link between the law’s restrictions and the stated security concerns, weakening its justification under strict scrutiny. [read post]
7 May 2024, 12:30 pm
Bissonnette v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 10:47 am
Machinists v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am
This is recognized in the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) at 9 FAM § 402.1-3 , which states that an “applicant desiring to come to the United States for one principal purpose, and one or more incidental purposes, must be classified in accordance with the principal purpose. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:12 am
Per another Supreme Court precedent, United States v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:30 am
Connecticut and Eisenstadt v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:01 am
Elrod v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:00 am
As stated by the tribunal in this case, “clear, convincing and cogent evidence is required to satisfy the balance of probabilities test”. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:00 am
As stated by the tribunal in this case, “clear, convincing and cogent evidence is required to satisfy the balance of probabilities test”. [read post]
7 May 2024, 4:06 am
Contesting the state’s segregationist policy, they took their case (Parker v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm
The FTC summarily states that a “hypothetical monopolist of accessible luxury handbags likely would undertake a SSNIPT on consumers” and could do so profitably. [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:57 am
SCARFE J.P., R. v. [read post]
