Search for: "State v. Hopkins" Results 221 - 240 of 802
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2019, 7:55 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
This finding was the crucial one in distinguishing it from the previous seminal case in privacy class actions, in Hopkins v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
” Michael Woods joined the head of the Government of Canada’s Trade Law Bureau, Robert Brookfield, Professor Lindsay Robertson of the University of Oklahoma and Professor James Hopkins of the University of Arizona on a panel to discuss the Indigenous elements in the Canada United States Mexico Agreement … _________________________ *Randomness here is created by Random.org and its list randomizing function. [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:26 am by CMS
Omar Qureshi, Dan Tench and Cathryn Hopkins of CMS comment on the decision which was handed down on 15 May 2019 by the UK Supreme Court in the matter of R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal and others [2019] UKSC 22:  On 15 May 2019, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment, deciding by a slim majority of 4:3 that an “ouster clause” in section 67(8) of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (“RIPA”)… [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:58 pm by INFORRM
In Lord Carnwath’s view, the provision in s.67(8) RIPA for a route of appeal to the Secretary of State did not add anything, given that that power had not been exercised and was ultimately an executive power, so did not support the argument that the courts should not have ultimate control [104]. [read post]
14 May 2019, 10:31 am by Miquel Montañá
The term “plausibility”, as such, was used for the first time in T 1329/04 (John Hopkins). [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the court ruled 5-4 in Lamps Plus Inc. v. [read post]