Search for: "State v. Jeremy D."
Results 221 - 240
of 430
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2014, 3:43 am
Greenwire’s Jeremy P. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 8:47 am
At Greenwire, Jeremy P. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 5:33 am
State v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 5:07 am
News that the five male Justices who voted in favor of the challengers in Burwell v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 8:28 am
On Saturday at 6 p.m., C-SPAN Radio will air the 1974 oral argument in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
Circuit Court’s en banc opinion in United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 12:27 pm
I was perfectly content with my life until Jeremy suggested that I blog about the United States Patent and Trademark Office (TTAB) Harry Winston v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 9:19 pm
Jump to Jeremy’s note and start reading it if you want to know the answers. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:30 am
FRENCH: Cliquez ici pour le télécharger. .GRAND CHAMBERCASE OF S.A.S. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:30 am
At Greenwire, Jeremy P. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 5:38 am
Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability On This Section 2(d) Refusal of ORGASMIC for Sex Education BooksPrecedential No. 24: Finding Pepper Sauce and Agave Sweetener Related, TTAB Affirms 2(d) Refual of "CHANTICO & Design"Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Are SUN SOUL ORCHESTRA and SOUL SUN Confusable for Musical Recordings? [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 4:05 am
In Halliburton v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:09 am
” Briefly: Jeremy P. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:32 am
The statutory language in Section 106 (a)(d)(2) refers to title to tangible property, i.e., the installed mural or sculpture. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
Greenwire’s Jeremy P. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 4:43 am
” In CTS Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 12:55 am
Following the Advocate General’s opinion [on which see Jeremy’s post here], yesterday the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) rendered its decision in Case C-360/12 Coty Germany GmbH v First Note Perfumes NV. [read post]
22 May 2014, 2:39 pm
Sundara Rajan, was posted for her by Jeremy. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:40 am
On the principle of the matter, he stated at 111:In my judgment this reasoning [from Rohm & Haas] is persuasive, and it is supported by the subsequent judgment of the Court of Appeal in Virgin v Premium. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:44 pm
Jeremy S. [read post]
