Search for: "State v. K. A. S."
Results 221 - 240
of 6,919
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2023, 10:12 am
For those following the proceedings in Province of Alberta et al v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 3:30 am
Late last month, the Court granted cert in Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 6:36 am
To state a cause of action for legal malpractice, a party must allege that “(1) the attorneywas negligent; (2) the attorney’s negligence was a proximate cause of [the party’s] losses; and (3) [the party] suffered actual damages” (RTW Retailwinds, Inc. v Colucci & Umans, 231 AD3d 509, 510 [1st Dept 2023], citing Excelsior Capitol LLC v K & L Gates LLP, 138 AD3d 492 [1st Dept 2016]). [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 10:56 am
Cir. 2013), the Federal Circuit held the expert “assumed that (1) the sales revenue reported in the customers’ Form 10-K reflected sales of products with molded chokes; and (2) each third-party product shipped into the United States contained an infringing choke. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 11:00 pm
United States Department of Health and Human Services , Case No. 6:22-cv-450-JDK (E.D. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 12:30 pm
Friends, we are excited to share that the Supreme Court has just taken up Gonzalez v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 8:00 am
Protocol I, article 50(3); ICTY Prosecutor v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 7:00 am
Second, the court’s deference must fit within international, constitutional, as well as statutory or other constraints and, third, the court’s deference must somehow be willed or accepted by the legislature. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 2:00 am
George K. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am
The PCT application names the three inventors as inventors and as applicants for the United States of America (US) only. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 6:34 pm
By Philip Won & Véronique Li, Senior Medical Device Regulation Expert —As we recently blogged, FDA released three draft guidance documents to help enhance the predictability, consistency, and transparency of the 510(k) program. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 1:10 pm
The need for the holding period came into sharp focus, the association said, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Slack Technologies LLC v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 5:19 am
" KME Germany GmbH v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 9:03 pm
In March 2023, in the wake of the US Supreme Court decision in Slack Technologies v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 3:40 pm
Aug. 14, 2023). [7] See Mobil Oil Corp. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
On August 25, 2023, two SEC compliance and disclosure interpretations (“C&DI”) were issued related to these quarterly disclosures.[1] C&DI 133A.01 states that Item 408(a)(1) of Regulation S-K does not require disclosure of termination of a plan that ends due to expiration or completion of the plan in accordance with its terms, without any action by an individual. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
On August 25, 2023, two SEC compliance and disclosure interpretations (“C&DI”) were issued related to these quarterly disclosures.[1] C&DI 133A.01 states that Item 408(a)(1) of Regulation S-K does not require disclosure of termination of a plan that ends due to expiration or completion of the plan in accordance with its terms, without any action by an individual. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm
GermanyUser v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 6:07 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 4:02 am
Facts Hurbain v. [read post]
