Search for: "State v. Kay" Results 221 - 240 of 573
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2018, 3:31 am by Daniel Hemel
His response seemed to please Kagan, who said: “[O]kay, I get it. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm by J
ECtHR jurisprudence made clear that the state was not required to tolerate unlawful occupation Hoire v UK, Yordanova v Bulgari [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm by J
ECtHR jurisprudence made clear that the state was not required to tolerate unlawful occupation Hoire v UK, Yordanova v Bulgari [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:04 pm by Katherine Pompilio
The Supreme Court has voted to overturn the landmark 1973 Roe v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:35 pm
The appeal to the CJ, which was heard shortly after Kay v Lambeth in the Lords, was allowed on the basis that, given the Council’s letter, quoted above, it was seriously arguable that the Council had acted in a way no reasonable person would consider justifiable. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 11:44 am by Benjamin Pollard
Anderson sat down with Derek Muller to discuss the independent state legislature doctrine in light of the pending Supreme Court case Moore v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 2:26 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Kay testified that using the stated interest rate and the default interest rate contained in the original terms of the mortgage, and crediting the payments by the Wife, there is accrued interest of over $1.5 million now owed on the original mortgage as computed between May 1993 and December 2005. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 5:00 am
It is now clear that the subjects in charge of collecting the fair compensation for private copying (e.g. collective management organisations) can bring proceedings before the courts of the Member State where the harm arising from missed payments is felt. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 4:35 pm
Early scrutiny of methods used during questioning of such persons occurred in the landmark decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Ireland v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 1:53 pm
In addition, Oklahoma's Electric Restructuring Act expressed an unmistakable policy preference for competition in the provision of electricity, according to the court.The decision is Kay Electric Cooperative v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:54 am by Steve Hall
"The state corrective process as a whole was ineffective," Brandt said.The opinion in Balentine v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm by David Smith
" Considering the issue of Articles 10 and 11 it was held by the Court that this case was not similar to Kay or Doherty as no balancing act had been carried out during the passing of the legislation. [read post]