Search for: "State v. Kirkland"
Results 221 - 240
of 297
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2011, 4:56 am
Becton, Dickinson and Company (Patently-O) Patent malpractice litigation: State versus federal jurisdiction: Magnetek, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 9:01 am
California was the first state to define and adopt the community property system. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 6:06 am
Wolf, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, on Thursday, August 23, 2018 Tags: Boards of Directors, Director nominations, ESG, Hedge funds, Index funds, Institutional Investors, Proxy contests, Shareholder activism, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder voting [read post]
17 May 2007, 9:50 am
Futures, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm
Canada On 6 February 2023, Smith J dismissed the defendant’s application to dismiss the plaintiff’s claim under an anti-SLAPP provision in the case of Kirkland v Nagy et al, 2023 ONSC 871. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:24 am
Corp. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 1:11 pm
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 7:26 pm
He described the circuit split leading to FTC v Actavis currently pending in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 6:06 am
Roper, Stanford University, on Thursday, September 1, 2016 Tags: Basic, Disclosure, Erica John Fund v. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 11:57 am
He lived in Hawaii before coming home to Washington State when his health began to fail. [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:13 am
For example, the majority and separate opinions in Jesner v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 9:16 am
They contended that the state court’s decision is inconsistent with Caldwell v. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 5:09 pm
The privacy v security fallacy. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 7:22 pm
” (Kirkland v Cablevision Systems). [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 10:25 am
Supreme Court itself agreed, stating in Virginia v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am
” http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/839921.opn.pdf State v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 1:34 pm
In a December case, United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Stronski, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Tuesday, July 11, 2023 Tags: Board composition, directors, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC enforcement, Shareholder activism, universal proxy rule X Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 6:11 am
The record contained several examples of pretext evidence that could be credited by a jury, including statements by the employee’s former supervisor, in regards to his ability to discipline his African-American regional managers, that “they don’t know how to police each other” and a statement that the regional office “could lighten up a bit,” the appeals court found (Kirkland v Cablevision Systems, July 25, 2014, per curiam). [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Stronski, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Tuesday, July 11, 2023 Tags: Board composition, directors, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC enforcement, Shareholder activism, universal proxy rule X Corp. v. [read post]
