Search for: "State v. L. G."
Results 221 - 240
of 2,853
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Before 1929, all securities markets in the United States were private and thus, dark. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:27 pm
Michael G. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 12:30 pm
The OA items herein were previously referenced on this blog as of 1 Jan. 2023.Bronze OA:"Domesticating the Kampala Convention as a Pivotal Step in Protecting Persons Displaced by Conflict and Violence in Northern Nigeria," Makerere Law Journal, vol. 21, no. 3 (2021) - Author = Nigeria"Examining the Impact of Covid-19 on Refugees in Tanzania," Makerere Law Journal, vol. 19, no. 1 (2021)- Author = Tanzania"When Half Bread is Simply Not Enough: Internally Displaced… [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:31 am
Hogan v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 3:33 am
Nat’l Inst. of Family & Life Advocates v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm
United States The Supreme Court is also expected to hear two cases – Moody v NetChoice and NetChoice v Paxton – concerning the constitutionality of laws in Florida and Texas, which restrict the content moderation capabilities of social media companies. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 7:50 am
Knox R, Curfman G. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:16 am
” United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 2:35 pm
”[8] This text states that a corporation’s cooperation with the government’s investigation is a mitigating factor by which a corporation can gain credit. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 11:33 am
Christian L. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am
On 20 December 2022, Chamberlain J heard costs applications in Wright v McCormack. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
”[2]For Marxist-Leninist and many post-colonial states, it is described as “Building a Community with a Shared Future for Mankind and Global Human Rights Governance. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 7:20 am
Nat’l Ink & Stitch, LLC v. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
Additionally, the Family Court properly included the children as protected persons on the order of protection, as the evidence demonstrated that doing so was “necessary to further the purposes of protection” (Family Ct Act § 842[l]; see Matter of Lengiewicz v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 9:52 am
Woulfe v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 7:30 am
In the 2015 Paris Agreement, Article 8 acknowledged the importance of L&D and the accompanying decision 1/CP.21 extended the WIM mandate, yet Paragraph 51 of the same decision stated that Article 8 provided no basis for climate-related liability or compensation. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 2:46 pm
In Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 5:53 am
State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
Soc’y Int’l L. [read post]
