Search for: "State v. Leisure"
Results 221 - 240
of 422
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2013, 2:48 pm
., v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
This is not an article about leisure reading of ebooks. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 7:04 am
” Lord Sumption, albeit with the benefit of later CJEU decisions in FAPL v QC Leisure and Infopaq II that were not available to Proudman J or the Court of Appeal, has made a clear statement that there is no policy reason why mere watching and listening (as opposed to downloading or printing) should be regarded as an infringement in the online world any more than in the offline world. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 6:53 am
Lord Sumption, albeit with the benefit of later CJEU decisions in FAPL v QC Leisure and Infopaq II that were not available to Proudman J or the Court of Appeal, has made a clear statement that there is no policy reason why mere watching and listening (as opposed to downloading or printing) should be regarded as an infringement in the online world any more than in the offline world. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court decided Florida v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 7:40 am
This was to be a time of complete and uninhibited leisure and merrymaking. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 4:39 am
Though he didn't attend the meeting he was still paid for the two hours that the meeting would have taken because his former supervisor considered that he would not have been in the motorcycle accident but for the meeting.The workers' compensation judge, the Appeals Board and the 5th District all found compensability.In Kansas, the state Supreme Court sent a case back to the fact finding courts to determine if an employee who was injured in a go-kart accident was in the course and scope of… [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 4:24 am
In the newly published decision of Benjamin v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 11:24 am
But it was this very question that the Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit considered this month (January 2013) in Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 11:24 am
But it was this very question that the Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit considered this month (January 2013) in Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 7:50 am
So it was fun to see the oral argument before the Court in Gabelli v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 6:20 am
In Miller v. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 10:31 am
Clinton/Gore (v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 1:15 am
Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Lonsdale Australia Limited [2012] FCAFC 130 Société Anonyme des Manujactures de Glaces v. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 11:20 am
The defendants in Petrovic v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 1:56 pm
The case – Coalition for Clean Air v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 1:56 pm
The case – Coalition for Clean Air v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 5:35 am
In Regina v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 8:51 pm
” You can read more about the Scalia v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 8:51 pm
” You can read more about the Scalia v. [read post]
