Search for: "State v. Lien"
Results 221 - 240
of 2,717
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2021, 11:46 am
This truism is amply displayed in the case of Y.Q. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2021, 11:33 am
On Thursday, a Second Circuit panel declined to resolve this issue in United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 10:51 am
Sanford v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 7:46 am
Contracts * Express Lien, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 11:07 am
In PEAC Consulting LLC v. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 6:53 am
An example of a construction dispute that took a nasty turn involving an interior decorator is SG 2901, LLC v. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 9:52 am
Ct. 1683, 1689 n.2 (2020); see also United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 8:08 am
Article X, Section 4 of Florida’s Constitution states that “no judgment, decree or execution shall be a lien” upon a homestead. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 3:09 pm
Cal. 1988). [3] See e.g., United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm
She came to this country as a teenage refugee from Vietnam and later served in the United States Army. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 8:12 am
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit tackled self-execution of 1958 Convention Article 6—curtailing jurisdiction over foreign vessels in international waters—in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 6:50 am
Price v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 7:25 pm
State Police, 227 N.J. 482, 500 (2017), and Caraballo v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 7:49 am
Will it be Chapter 7 v. 13? [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 8:15 am
The Court is stating that, much like the qualifying labor or materials under a mechanic’s lien, to qualify for Miller Act treatment, the “labor” must have been “incorporated” into the project in a way that is directly associated with the job duties of the claimant. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 8:15 am
The Fairfax case, The Barber of Seville, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 8:15 am
The Court is stating that, much like the qualifying labor or materials under a mechanic’s lien, to qualify for Miller Act treatment, the “labor” must have been “incorporated” into the project in a way that is directly associated with the job duties of the claimant. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 8:15 am
The Fairfax case, The Barber of Seville, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 2:21 am
To survive a motion to dismiss under 3211(a)(7), “a pleading need only state allegations from which damages attributable to the defendant’s conduct may be reasonably inferred” (Lappin v Greenberg, 34 AD3d 277, 279 [1st Dept 2006] [internal citations omitted]). [read post]
23 May 2021, 2:04 pm
” Sandberg v. [read post]
