Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 221 - 240
of 25,967
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2010, 11:14 am
We conclude the error, if any, in admitting the challenged testimony was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of Whyte's guilt. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 9:26 am
"In light of the not uncommon practice of lawyers to argue inconsistent theories, we cannot say that the decision of Dekoria Marks's trial lawyer to argue them here deprived her of the right to constitutionally effective assistance, irrespective of whether we or the [...] [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 3:29 pm
The petitioner in Gamble v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 4:01 am
USA Today’s Brad Heath twitted a great quote** from United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 3:20 am
In the case of Kansas v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:17 am
See Meyer by Meyer v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 1:00 am
Facts of Granholm v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 11:34 am
State v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:51 am
Garland, 593 U.S. 155, 171–72 (2021); United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 1:47 pm
On October 18, 2012, in Windsor v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 2:11 am
However, the Court urgently called on the Secretary of State to review the application of the policy to the appellant’s case in the light of new information as to the fairness of the proceedings in Indonesia. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 5:51 am
Lugashi stated that other California courts . . . had previously rejected similar claims, as had a majority of other state courts and some federal courts. . . . [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:09 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 11:07 am
Supreme Court's ruling this week in American Electric Power v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 11:01 am
In Winslow v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 9:00 am
This is no surprise to Point of Law readers (Jan. 10; Jan. 13; May 24), but it does mean that three bogus consumer-fraud class actions over light cigarettes return to state... [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:47 pm
In light of United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 5:02 am
In Schacklett v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 2:26 pm
On January 4, 2012, CAAF granted review of the first issue, and specified the second issue: Whether, in light of United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 10:57 am
Met Life, where the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York agreed that determining the nature and extent of MetLife's structural conflict of interest warranted significant discovery, particularly in light of the U.S. [read post]
