Search for: "State v. Light" Results 221 - 240 of 29,398
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2024, 6:15 am by Lawrence Solum
Marion County Elections Board, which allowed states to enforce voter ID laws and make it harder for people to vote The Court v. [read post]
” The likelihood of such appeal is questionable, however, particularly in light of the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
” The likelihood of such appeal is questionable, however, particularly in light of the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 6:20 am by Steven Schwartzapfel
For example, these crashes can occur at an intersection with stop lights or signs. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 12:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
But state courts are entitled to read their state constitutions as more speech-protective than the federal Constitution. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
Yet the courts’ ability to thwart attempted election subversion remains a question mark in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decisions in Trump v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 7:58 am by Phil Dixon
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 6:31 pm
   Volume 37, Issue 5 September 2024 Special Issue: Legal Comparison beyond the Law in Late Rodolfo Sacco Issue Editors: Elena Ioriatti, Mario Ricca 17 articles in this issue … [read post]
On July 26, 2024, the National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) issued its Fair Choice – Employee Voice Final Rule (“Final Rule”), which rescinds a trio of April 2020 amendments to the Board’s Rules and Regulations[1] affecting the Board’s processing of petitions that ultimately make it easier for unions to maintain recognition and stifles employee choice in whether to be represented by a union. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 10:22 am by Giles Peaker
An example would be where the landlord gets the year wrong, as in Pease v Carter (where a notice of possession proceedings served on 7th November 2018 stated that court proceedings would not begin until after 26th November 2017, an obvious typographical error). [read post]