Search for: "State v. Link" Results 221 - 240 of 24,189
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2024, 12:00 pm by Evan Brown
(One has to consider whether these would pass First Amendment scrutiny, particularly in light of recent decisions such as the one in NetChoice v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:47 am by Hayleigh Bosher
Helen Gubby commences the discussion on the latter in chapter 9, by linking sustainability to ethics. [read post]
Authors: Ray Giblett, James Morris, Rajaee Rouhani, Stephen Lee, Jeremy Moller, Charles Nugent-Young, Merren Taylor, Timothy Chan, Joshua Kan, Dylan Sault and Steven Li  Welcome to our first wrap up of the year! [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 1:00 pm by Annette Demers
Next on my AI Reading List I’ve just ordered (and our staff immediately delivered the e-book link for) Roman V Yampolskiy, AI: Unexplainable, Unpredictable, Uncontrollable (Taylor and Francis Group, 2024). [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Unknown
The 2023 Proxy Statement stated that Apple intended to award the NEOs $77.5 million in performance-based compensation in each of 2021 and 2022. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
While many states look to Delaware as an authority on issues of corporate law, companies that are incorporated in other states should consult with local counsel to ensure that any relevant differences are taken into consideration. [2] See, e.g., Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 4:11 am by Marty Lederman
Below are links to the complete series of my posts on Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 4:05 am by SHG
He has had a bumpy ride of late, what with the leak of the decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:03 am by Will Baude
  Though the article is set to appear in print sometime this month, it might not beat the Supreme Court's decision in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Nothing in the post-2013 Act case law suggests that the section 3(3) requirement is any less permissive (see, for example, the first instance decision in Butt v Secretary of State [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB), and particularly Mr Justice Nicol’s comments at [39]. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:47 pm by Cooper Quintin
   Regardless of who is behind the Association of Appin Training Centers, the links between Khare and Appin Technology are extensive and clear. [read post]