Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 221 - 240
of 3,588
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2018, 4:31 pm
By Judgment handed down on 29 November 2018 (R (on the Application of Jefferies and Others) v (1) Secretary of State for the Home Department (2) Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport [2018] EWHC 3239 (Admin)) Lord Justice Davis and Mr Justice Ouseley dismissed the Claimants claims for Judicial Review of the Government’s decision to not embark on ‘Part 2’ of the Leveson Inquiry. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 1:58 am
Lord Kerr and Baroness Hale gave dissenting judgments. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 1:21 am
Lord Neuberger similarly stated that courts should “bear clearly in mind” the need to interpret the duty in a way which does not impose an impossible or disproportionate burden on the police. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 2:24 am
The Appeal Court failed to draw a distinction between the threat from other prisoners, and the conduct for which the state was responsible, whereas the correct legal test when the threat comes from the acts of third parties is whether the state has failed to provide reasonable protection against harm inflicted by non-state agents. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:19 am
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v SSHD, W & BB v SSHD and Z, G, U & Y v SSHD, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 5:44 am
I spend the morning reading into Privy Council case of Hunte and another v The State, a miscarriage of justice case from Trinidad and Tobago that is starting next week. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm
The following judgments are to be handed down in the Supreme Court on Wednesday 25 May 2011: FA (Iraq) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 23 – 24 February 2011 (our case preview is here) Shepherd Masimba Kambadzi (also known as SK (Zimbabwe)) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10 – 11 February 2011 Fraser v Her Majesty’s Advocate, heard 21 – 22 March 2011 (here is our case preview) … [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 2:17 am
The Supreme Court by a majority of 4 to 1 (Lord Hughes dissenting) dismissed MM’s appeal. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 2:00 am
In regards to the proportionality argument, Lord Clarke stated that, in this case, the absence of a specified time limit for detention does not infringe the principles in R v Governor of Durham Prison, Ex P Hardial Singh [1984] 1 WLR 704. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 6:11 am
He held (at paragraph 26) that this approach was wrong, thus overruling the decision in GW v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 2:00 am
The Supreme CourtThe Supreme Court appeal will be heard by a panel of five, comprised of Lord Neuberger, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption and Lord Hodge. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 2:56 am
The High Court and the Court of Appeal declined to set aside the consent order on the basis that Mr Sharland would not have made a substantially different order in the financial proceedings, applying the decision of the House of Lords in Livesey (formerly Jenkins) v Jenkins [1985] AC 424. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
It has been forcefully argued that the decision of the Court of Appeal is inconsistent with the decision of the House of Lords in Jameel v Wall Street Journal ([2007] 1 AC 359). [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
This is only the second time that the highest court has considered the application of the “responsible publication in the public interest”, first established by the House of Lords in Reynolds v Times Newspapers ([2001] 2 AC 127) nearly 12 years ago. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:31 pm
First, on Monday 4 and Tuesday 5 April 2011, Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown, Kerr and Dyson will hear R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. [read post]
28 May 2012, 9:07 am
The appeal by way of case stated in the “Twitter joke” case (Chambers v DPP) was heard on 8 February 2012 and judgment was reserved. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 1:25 pm
. -- then imagine what it's like in a state prison.Why read Lord of the Flies when you can get a similar, nonfictional recitation from the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 4:05 am
Supreme Court's landmark decision in School District of Abington Township, Pennsylvania v. [read post]
