Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 221 - 240
of 3,605
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2020, 5:43 pm
The panel will be Lord Reed, Lord Wilson, Lord Briggs, Lady Arden and Lord Kitchin. [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 7:24 am
On 6 February 2025 the House of Lords Financial Services Regulation Committee published its report entitled ‘Naming and shaming: how not to regulate’ on the FCA’s November 2024 CP24/2, Part 2 regarding the controversial ‘name and shame’ proposals (which we summarised here). [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 1:58 am
Lord Kerr and Baroness Hale gave dissenting judgments. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 11:25 am
House disguised as a Barn In Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor v Welwyn Hatfield BC [2011] UKSC 15 Lord Hope describe the actions of Mr Beesely thus: "Frankly, the dishonesty involved in this case is so far removed from almost anything else that I have ever encountered in this area of the law that it appears to constitute a category all of its own. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 11:25 am
House disguised as a Barn In Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor v Welwyn Hatfield BC [2011] UKSC 15 Lord Hope describe the actions of Mr Beesely thus: "Frankly, the dishonesty involved in this case is so far removed from almost anything else that I have ever encountered in this area of the law that it appears to constitute a category all of its own. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 2:24 am
The Appeal Court failed to draw a distinction between the threat from other prisoners, and the conduct for which the state was responsible, whereas the correct legal test when the threat comes from the acts of third parties is whether the state has failed to provide reasonable protection against harm inflicted by non-state agents. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 1:21 am
Lord Neuberger similarly stated that courts should “bear clearly in mind” the need to interpret the duty in a way which does not impose an impossible or disproportionate burden on the police. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 4:31 pm
By Judgment handed down on 29 November 2018 (R (on the Application of Jefferies and Others) v (1) Secretary of State for the Home Department (2) Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport [2018] EWHC 3239 (Admin)) Lord Justice Davis and Mr Justice Ouseley dismissed the Claimants claims for Judicial Review of the Government’s decision to not embark on ‘Part 2’ of the Leveson Inquiry. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 5:44 am
I spend the morning reading into Privy Council case of Hunte and another v The State, a miscarriage of justice case from Trinidad and Tobago that is starting next week. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:19 am
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v SSHD, W & BB v SSHD and Z, G, U & Y v SSHD, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 2:17 am
The Supreme Court by a majority of 4 to 1 (Lord Hughes dissenting) dismissed MM’s appeal. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 2:00 am
In regards to the proportionality argument, Lord Clarke stated that, in this case, the absence of a specified time limit for detention does not infringe the principles in R v Governor of Durham Prison, Ex P Hardial Singh [1984] 1 WLR 704. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm
The following judgments are to be handed down in the Supreme Court on Wednesday 25 May 2011: FA (Iraq) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 23 – 24 February 2011 (our case preview is here) Shepherd Masimba Kambadzi (also known as SK (Zimbabwe)) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10 – 11 February 2011 Fraser v Her Majesty’s Advocate, heard 21 – 22 March 2011 (here is our case preview) … [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 6:11 am
He held (at paragraph 26) that this approach was wrong, thus overruling the decision in GW v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 2:00 am
The Supreme CourtThe Supreme Court appeal will be heard by a panel of five, comprised of Lord Neuberger, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption and Lord Hodge. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 2:56 am
The High Court and the Court of Appeal declined to set aside the consent order on the basis that Mr Sharland would not have made a substantially different order in the financial proceedings, applying the decision of the House of Lords in Livesey (formerly Jenkins) v Jenkins [1985] AC 424. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
It has been forcefully argued that the decision of the Court of Appeal is inconsistent with the decision of the House of Lords in Jameel v Wall Street Journal ([2007] 1 AC 359). [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
This is only the second time that the highest court has considered the application of the “responsible publication in the public interest”, first established by the House of Lords in Reynolds v Times Newspapers ([2001] 2 AC 127) nearly 12 years ago. [read post]
