Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 221 - 240
of 4,026
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2022, 7:44 am
And the cases the Court will hear this year are noteworthy—affirmative action, voting rights, and the "independent state legislature doctrine," among others.But because I'm not a very political person, I'm interested in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 10:58 am
” The Act states that the signature may be an electronic signature. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 9:36 am
The AG’s opinion certainly reads like he closely studied, and perhaps sought inspiration from, Lord Leggatt’s leading judgment in Lloyd v Google (see our analysis of that decision here). [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 6:07 am
Moreover, in Pioneer Aggregates (UK) Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment [1985] AC 132 the House of Lords held that there is no room for any principle of abandonment in planning law. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 1:13 am
He noted that in Efobi v Royal Mail Group Ltd [2021] UKSC 33, about an allegation of discrimination made by a postman of Nigerian ethnic origin, Lord Leggatt had said at paragraph [28] that “it did not matter if the employer had acted for an unfair or discreditable reason provided that the reason had nothing to do with the protected characteristic” [33]. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 12:54 am
Like Lady Poole, Lord Brailsford is a Senator of the College of Justice. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 4:49 am
And indeed, Lord Justice Arnold held that "[e]ach side has adopted its position in an attempt to game the system in its favour" and generally criticizes what he considers "the dysfunctional state of the current system for determining SEP/FRAND disputes. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 10:35 am
This state of affairs is problematic for two reasons. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
The Lord Justices of the House of Lords stated in the case of Ranger v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 7:52 am
Annex V to the CRA sets the precise details of what the technical documentation must contain. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm
Hildebrant (in 1916), to Smiley v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
Willson v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 1:01 am
The Lord Advocate states he has this in writing which can be provided to the Court (along with any further relevant background info). [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 6:00 pm
[1] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022] UKSC 25. [2] Companies Act 2006, section 172. [3] Companies Act 2006, section 172(3). [4] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2019] EWCA Civ 112. [5] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022] UKSC 25 [7] (Reed LJ). [6] Companies Act 2006, Part 23. [7] https://www.supremecourt.uk/press-summary/uksc-2019-0046.html [8] https://www.supremecourt.uk/press-summary/uksc-2019-0046.html [9] (n 4). [10] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022] UKSC 25… [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 1:00 am
On Tuesday 11th and Wednesday 12th October, the court will hear the Reference by the Lord Advocate of devolution issues under paragraph 34 of Schedule 6 to the Scotland Act 1998. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 1:50 pm
ShareIn Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am
Insofar as Mostyn J had previously determined otherwise in cases such as DL v SL [2015] EWHC 2621 (Fam); [2016] 1 WLR 1259 and Appleton v Gallagher, he was wrong: Gallagher at [33]-[34]. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 1:44 am
In this post, Clare Montgomery KC of Matrix Chambers comments on the decision in Craig v Her Majesty’s Advocate (for the Government of the United States of America) and another (Scotland) [2022] UKSC 6. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 9:02 am
The stated intention is to hold this vote on 19 October 2023. [read post]
