Search for: "State v. M. Root"
Results 221 - 240
of 913
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
FDA Commissioner Stephen M. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
How does all this relate to Koppelman’s argument in Gay Rights v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
” Take, for example, his statement that Burwell v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
“The New Era of Smarter Food Safety Blueprint leverages the existing relationships with domestic mutual reliance with state, local, tribal, and territorial food safety agencies while also enhancing this relationship through information sharing, modernizing inspections, and adoption of root cause analysis. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm
Circuit had outlined these “demanding standards” in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:01 am
For example, in 2017, the CERD stated it was “deeply concerned” that “[v]iolations of the land rights of indigenous peoples continue” and that “[c]ostly, time-consuming and ineffective litigation is often the only remedy, in place of seeking free, prior and informed consent — resulting in the State party continuing to issue permits which allow for damage to lands. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:03 pm
For example, the Ninth Circuit held that the Fifth Circuit erred in Texas v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 6:30 am
(“I’m not the bigot, you’rethe bigot! [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
Under the 1980 ruling in Owen v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 1:07 pm
State Medicaid Coverage Issues of CPT Code 99050 and CPT Code 99051: If a participating provider treats a Medicaid recipient after normal business hours, a number of State Medicaid plans now permit a participating provider to bill an appropriate Evaluation and Management (E/M) code AND bill CPT 99050 or CPT 99051 as an additional charge to reflect the fact that after-hours care was provided. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 1:07 pm
State Medicaid Coverage Issues of CPT Code 99050 and CPT Code 99051: If a participating provider treats a Medicaid recipient after normal business hours, a number of State Medicaid plans now permit a participating provider to bill an appropriate Evaluation and Management (E/M) code AND bill CPT 99050 or CPT 99051 as an additional charge to reflect the fact that after-hours care was provided. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:26 pm
I'm afraid the answer to that, in my book, is no, too. [read post]
7 May 2020, 1:06 pm
" United States v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 12:30 am
A different view was expressed in a 2017 speech by then-Judge and now-Justice Brett M. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Gary B. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 10:57 am
These loops are usually more fununless you're SCOV-Law-level nerdyState v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 7:00 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 9:11 am
First, while some of the dissent is a reiteration of complaints Gorsuch raised in his dissent two years ago in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
Really, I'm flummoxed here. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 10:12 am
I'm not sure why Justice Kavanaugh dissented from IV-B-2. [read post]
