Search for: "State v. Makee R."
Results 221 - 240
of 34,854
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2023, 2:12 am
In this post, Shabbir Bokhari, a paralegal in the Litigation & Arbitration team at CMS comments on the decision from the Supreme Court in R (AAA and Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42 which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am
He discusses the application of De Keyser principles and the controls imposed by Parliament on prerogative powers to ratify international treaties. 13.05: The hearing has adjourned for lunch and is expected to resume at 14:00. 12.58: The next case referred to is R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ex parte Rees-Mogg: James Eadie QC submits that the availability of the prerogative in relation to EU law depends… [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 9:16 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 4:44 pm
State v Vaughn In arguing that he had ineffective trial counsel, Vaughn stated that his attorney should not have requested consecutive sentences. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court case (Michigan v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 4:57 am
In both R v Soneju [2005] UKHL 49 and R v Knights [2005] UKHL 50, the House of Lords was concerned with a breach of the then applicable six-month time limit for making a confiscation order. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 9:23 am
Chelsea, it all makes sense. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 12:25 pm
Last Fall Steve posted about United States v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 3:00 pm
” Grupo R’s liens arose when it caused the MAYA and MARANGO to be attached under Texas state law. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
R. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:48 am
”) State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 3:23 am
Opinion by Judge James R. [read post]
23 May 2022, 2:24 pm
McGinley, Jonathan R. [read post]
23 May 2022, 2:24 pm
McGinley, Jonathan R. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
Tambone, the case against James R. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 6:00 am
As if Michael Gove MP needed further reminding, in wake of Colin Yeo’s appearance on World at One on Wednesday where he pointed out the fundamental error of the Justice Secretary’s assertion that Britain cannot deport EEA nationals with a criminal record, the Supreme Court in R (Nouazli) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 16 makes clear that EEA nationals can be deported by virtue of the Immigration (European Economic Area)… [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 11:12 am
The case of R. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 10:41 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 8:50 am
ECHR, art 14 is not violated because there are clear policy reasons for making distinctions between Zambrano carers and others, for the same reasons as justify the indirect discrimination. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 3:22 pm
Taking into consideration the cases of A v United Kingdom (3455/05) (2009) 49 EHRR 29 ECHR (Grand Chamber) and Secretary of State for the Home Department v F (2009) UKHL 28, (2009) 3 WLR 74, the claimants’ arguments on this point were upheld. [read post]
