Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 221 - 240
of 21,405
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
In Trinity Wall St. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:50 am
Grateful American Apparel LLC v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
This year marks our 10th annual accounting of ridiculous redactions, outrageous copying fees, and retaliatory attacks on requesters—and we have some doozies for the ages. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 1:55 pm
With the decision of Dobbs v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 8:00 am
Davis v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 7:31 am
However, In Arsenal, the ECJ (as it then was) stated that the exclusive rights granted to a trade mark proprietor are “… to enable the trade mark proprietor to protect his specific interests as proprietor, that is, to ensure that the trade mark can fulfil its functions. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 8:50 am
Speakers include Harvard Law Professor Jonathan Zittrain; former Library Innovation law director Adam Ziegler; Ravel Law cofounders Nik Reed and Daniel Lewis; Free Law Project founder Mike Lissner; Legal Information Institute executive director Sara Frug; Angela Jaffee, account director at vLex and former national programs administrator for the Administrative Office of the United States Courts; Carl Malamud, founder of Public.Resource.Org; Harvard Law Professor Alexandra Natapoff; and Chief… [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 2:16 am
By Mark A. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
” This is precisely what the Supreme Court called for in TSC Industries v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 8:55 pm
Here is the abstract: In recent years, many prominent originalists have attempted to demonstrate that the holding in Brown v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:39 pm
Bakshi v Hosseinzadeh (2017 ONCA 838) marks the seminal case which questions whether property transferred as Mahr, should be excluded pursuant to section 4(2) of the FLA or whether it should be included in the parties’ Net Family Property (NFP) for purposes of the equalization calculation. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:39 pm
Bakshi v Hosseinzadeh (2017 ONCA 838) marks the seminal case which questions whether property transferred as Mahr, should be excluded pursuant to section 4(2) of the FLA or whether it should be included in the parties’ Net Family Property (NFP) for purposes of the equalization calculation. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 5:16 am
However, these allegations are “utterly refute[d]” by the documentary evidence, which defined the scope of the parties’ engagement and confirmed that defendants had no such duty (Chen v Romona Keveza Collection LLC, 208 AD3d 152, 157 [1st Dept 2022] [internal quotation marks omitted]; CPLR 3211 [a] [1]). [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
” Those words from the Supreme Court in its Trump v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am
Given his decision to refuse a faculty to remove all of the pews, the Chancellor stated that the Petitioners may wish to re-think their proposals in respect of the heating. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:59 am
[Cite to Ohio State v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
Indeed, Griffin’s Case was about a state office, and the Court in Trump v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 6:19 am
Anderson: States cannot disqualify candidates for federal offices from the ballot under Section 3. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 5:30 am
But the court, in adopting an expansive reading of a recent Supreme Court precedent, cautioned that the news publication might have a strong defense on the likelihood of confusion analysis (Punchbowl, Inc. v. [read post]
