Search for: "State v. McKenna"
Results 221 - 240
of 385
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2021, 12:00 am
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 14-16 June 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application… [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 9:03 pm
Qi Andrew and Gucci America v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 3:14 am
McKenna v Connors, 36 AD3d 1062, 1063). [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
Sprigman: Came up in Apple v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:35 pm
UPDATE: Mark McKenna has posted his own recap. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
APPELLATE / IP In Coffee Battle (Folgers v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 6:30 pm
McKenna will argue on behalf of the petitioners. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:14 pm
Aug. 18, 2010).McKenna v. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 7:11 am
Mark McKenna: Is there any relationship between cost and care or differences in how that manifests in categories? [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 11:05 am
NY State created a postmortem right of publicity specifically for computer-generated likenesses; Louisiana did so too. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 8:56 am
Purdum v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
" [emphasis added by LawPundit]In supporting Justice McKenna and in not supporting Justice Harlan, Epstein is as wrong as those who supported Justice Henry Billings Brown (who never earned a law degree) in Plessy v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 12:03 pm
Author: Luke Hasskamp This article—the third in a series—focuses on the Supreme Court’s decision in Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 6:07 am
See, e.g., McKenna v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Bigger, Stronger, Faster: The PCAOB After The Supreme Court Ruling by Francine McKenna at re: The Auditors The Supreme Court will decide on Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:51 am
Stated motivation: “Brand is a guarantee for quality. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:39 pm
McKenna: we can’t really mean that a state of uncertainty is actionable—if we did, “I don’t know whether X makes this” would be actionable/part of the “confused” group. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 2:47 pm
Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 12:18 pm
Copyright: Baker v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:02 pm
Pratt here (concurring and dissenting) joined by Justice McKenna, State v. [read post]
