Search for: "State v. McKenna"
Results 221 - 240
of 377
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2023, 11:05 am
NY State created a postmortem right of publicity specifically for computer-generated likenesses; Louisiana did so too. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:35 pm
UPDATE: Mark McKenna has posted his own recap. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 8:56 am
Purdum v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
APPELLATE / IP In Coffee Battle (Folgers v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 6:30 pm
McKenna will argue on behalf of the petitioners. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:14 pm
Aug. 18, 2010).McKenna v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 12:03 pm
Author: Luke Hasskamp This article—the third in a series—focuses on the Supreme Court’s decision in Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
" [emphasis added by LawPundit]In supporting Justice McKenna and in not supporting Justice Harlan, Epstein is as wrong as those who supported Justice Henry Billings Brown (who never earned a law degree) in Plessy v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 6:07 am
See, e.g., McKenna v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Bigger, Stronger, Faster: The PCAOB After The Supreme Court Ruling by Francine McKenna at re: The Auditors The Supreme Court will decide on Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:51 am
Stated motivation: “Brand is a guarantee for quality. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:39 pm
McKenna: we can’t really mean that a state of uncertainty is actionable—if we did, “I don’t know whether X makes this” would be actionable/part of the “confused” group. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 12:18 pm
Copyright: Baker v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am
Way to deal with specimen laundering, as in LTTB and in Ohio State’s THE. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 2:47 pm
Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 12:35 pm
People v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:02 pm
Pratt here (concurring and dissenting) joined by Justice McKenna, State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:18 am
Americans v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 2:51 pm
Stevens quotes Justice McKenna in Weems v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 5:54 am
” Commentary on Michigan v. [read post]