Search for: "State v. Norfolk" Results 221 - 240 of 442
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm by familoo
However, caselaw confirms that welfare is still ‘a primary consideration’ (ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] 2 AC 166, [2011] UKSC 4), so it’s going to be a pretty important factor in any consideration of publication, and in many cases it will be determinative. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 6:48 am
[She] stated to me in substance, ‘I won't leave you alone. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
While this argument seems persuasive, the Norfolk, VA Circuit Court disagreed. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Norfolk Southern Railway Co., Wellness Int’l Network, Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm by Adam Wagner
In Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority [1986] 1 FLR 224, HL the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) held that a girl under 16 could validly consent to contraception “provided that she has sufficient understanding and intelligence to know what they involve“. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 1:07 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Champion) v North Norfolk District Council & Anor, heard 23 June 2015. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority (1985) Emma Nottingham57. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12-14 January 2016. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 7:41 am by Walter James
  USCG inspectors boarded the vessel when it entered port in Norfolk and discovered the “magic pipe. [read post]