Search for: "State v. Patterson" Results 221 - 240 of 874
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2019, 3:45 am by William Ford
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm by MOTP
Patterson, Jr., Trustee of the Deborah Patterson Howard Trust. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 7:39 am by Patricia Salkin
Town of Patterson Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 43 A.D.3d 926, 929, 841 N.Y.S.2d 650 [2007]; see Matter of Cohen v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
This excerpt chronicles Donald’s journey to defend Mi’kmaw treaty rights in the Supreme Court of Canada and sets the stage for understanding the impacts of R. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:47 am by William Ford
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 7:08 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 11:58 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 7:12 am by Aurora Barnes
” The petitions of the week are: Patterson v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 8:28 am by Donald Barbati
Writing for the majority of the Court, Justice Anne Patterson found that while directives from the State Attorney General, the State’s top law enforcement official, carry the force of law, the same cannot be said for local police executives. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 8:28 am by Donald Barbati
Writing for the majority of the Court, Justice Anne Patterson found that while directives from the State Attorney General, the State’s top law enforcement official, carry the force of law, the same cannot be said for local police executives. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Courts in New York State have consistently recognized the importance of using progressive discipline.Rulings by the New York State Supreme Court, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, and the Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, suggest an employer’s in assigning severe penalties for certain “first offenses” may not survive judicial review. [read post]