Search for: "State v. Primes" Results 221 - 240 of 2,967
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2014, 2:06 pm by Michael Cannon
In October 2013, the state of Indiana filed Indiana v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Dempster v Liotti ; 2011 NY Slip Op 04408 ; Decided on May 24, 2011 ; Appellate Division, Second Department ; Belen, J. we see a prime example. [read post]
Gulyás stated that Hungary has a claim after the EC reimbursed other Schengen border states. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 6:25 am by Ben Rubin
Wisc.) praised the result, stating that private property rights need to be protected from improper government seizure, citing the case of Kelo v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights yesterday held a hearing in Doğan and Others v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 1:00 am by CAFE
’s Prime Minister, Brexit, and the IRC’s work on behalf of refugees and displaced persons. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 4:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” NY Prime Holding LLC v Nationstar Mtge., LLC  2019 NY Slip Op 30857(U)  March 27, 2019  Supreme Court, New York County  Docket Number: 157879/2018 Judge: John J. [read post]
11 May 2018, 7:36 am by Sarah Tate Chambers
Mahathir Mohamad, the new prime minister, previously served as prime minister for 20 years in the 1980s and 90s. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 10:53 am by John Floyd
  Previously Participated as Counsel for the State   Article 30.01 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure and Article V, Section 11, of the Texas Constitution both require the disqualification of a judge “who has previously participated as counsel for the State in a pending matter. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:46 am by Adam Baker
ED refused on the basis of a stated practice not to sign letters of intent prior to the award of a prime contract. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:09 pm by NARF
Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community (Tribal Sovereign Immunity; Health Care) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2023.html Medina v. [read post]
12 May 2017, 2:00 am by Brian G. Lee
The court stated that the analysis for general jurisdiction is whether “corporation is essentially ‘at home’ in the forum state. [read post]