Search for: "State v. Refuge"
Results 221 - 240
of 564
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2009, 12:32 am
Tompkins principles in Rimbert v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 5:40 am
Implied preemption cannot be relevant where there is no state-law claim to begin with—for example, when a state-law creates a safe harbor into which the defendant can take refuge. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 10:11 am
See United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another, ex parte Shah (1999) Nora Honkala72. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 8:59 pm
US, No. 06-6369 Judgments finding that plaintiffs-landowners have an easement by reservation over a field-access road crossing a national wildlife refuge, and that the government lacks power under the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act to regulate that easement, are affirmed in part and reversed in part where: 1) state law on parol evidence does not prevent a court from considering letters expressing prior deedholders' intent to reserve an express… [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 11:54 pm
She presented to the London Refuge. [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 12:19 pm
A unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, based in Philadelphia, ruled on December 20 in Doe v. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 3:22 pm
” In Nixon v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Federal Female Genital Mutilation Ban Exceeds Congress's Power, Holds District Court
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm
Policing such behavior, the court concludes, is a matter for the states, because it isn't authorized as a regulation of commerce or as necessary and proper to comply with treaties.The decision, handed down today, is U.S. v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Federal Female Genital Mutilation Ban Exceeds Congress's Power, Holds District Court
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm
Policing such behavior, the court concludes, is a matter for the states, because it isn't authorized as a regulation of commerce or as necessary and proper to comply with treaties.The decision, handed down today, is U.S. v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 3:35 pm
As in the years after Brown v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 9:54 pm
Poway Unified School District and Nuxoll v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 5:04 am
United States (rejecting an extremely broad theory of tax obstruction), Bond v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 6:01 am
[V]irtue was in short supply, not only among the murderers, gamblers, slavers, squatters, and drunks who poured over the border from Georgia, but among the erstwhile elite. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 9:15 pm
Frontier Stone, LLC v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 3:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 1:00 pm
[1] Dobbs v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 7:46 am
Bird v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 11:00 am
Jan. 27, 2015), and Garza v. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 1:54 pm
In R v. [read post]
