Search for: "State v. S. C. D."
Results 221 - 240
of 13,925
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2024, 8:59 am
[Cite to Ohio State v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
" (NSBA v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Readers are requested to notify the Reporter ofDecisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:08 am
Use of a trade mark as a trade or company name or part thereof (Art. 10(3)(d) TMD/Art. 9(3)(d) EUTMR) as such has been found not to be trade mark infringing as it does not constitute use ‘in relation to goods or services’ (CJEU, Céline, case C-17/06, IPKat here). [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
[Professor Shugerman's argument that the 1793 Hamilton Document, that is, a list of "every person holding any civil office or employment under the United States, (except the judges)," was intended to ensure compliance with the Constitution's Sinecure Clause lacks support.] [read post]
The Recalibration of Colonel Brock: D.C. Circuit Ruling for J6 Rioter Could Impact Hundreds of Cases
3 Mar 2024, 4:01 am
Here is the opinion: United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Joshua D. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
United States, the Court found the agency’s decision to follow GAO’s recommendation to evaluate the protester’s proposal as though its key personnel was unavailable was irrational.[1] In this case, KPMG proposed Mr. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:23 pm
C 12-0195 PJH, 2012 WL 12964819, at *3 (N.D. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am
Jeffery-Poulter, p. 148 – 150. [4] Dudgeon v the United Kingdom App no 7525/76 (ECtHR, 22 October 1981). [5] United Nations’ Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. [6] CEDAW/C/OP.8/GBR/1 2018 – paras. 83 – 85. [7] [2018] UKSC 27. [8] The Abortion Act 1967: a biography of a UK law, S. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 4:05 pm
Finally, Part D will examine various state laws and executive orders targeting the trans community, and how they can be combatted under a due process or equal protection analysis. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 6:41 am
Governance agreements frequently have a statutory grounding in a section of the DGCL (for example, stockholder agreements are rooted in Section 218(c) and (d)). [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 7:08 pm
§ l 56(c)(4) and 37 C.F.R. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 12:07 pm
This would be a Scott v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
D. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:48 pm
For instance, 8 CFR 245.1(d)(2)(i) implements the technical exception under INA 245(c)(2), which precludes one to file an I-485 application for adjustment of status who has failed to maintain lawful status “other than through no fault of his own or for tech [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:19 am
In HTC Corp. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 7:56 am
However, in the case of Dong v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 7:49 am
” People v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Purcell Professor Robert C. [read post]
