Search for: "State v. Sales"
Results 221 - 240
of 20,988
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2024, 2:06 pm
Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
” WCG would “support [Trifecta] with over 100 sales and marketing staff. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 11:48 am
” In this matter, the Court aligned itself with the reasoning articulated in the recent federal New York City v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 10:39 pm
They usually, although not always, were imposed at the point of sale. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
” The case, Johnson v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 3:20 pm
In addition to the violations surrounding hypothetical performance, one adviser was also found to have (i) made false and misleading statements, (ii) advertised misleading model performance, (iii) been unable to substantiate performance shown in its advertisements, (iv) failed to enter into written agreements with people it compensated for endorsements, and (v) violated recordkeeping and compliance standards including filing a prospectus with the SEC which contained misleading statements… [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 2:34 pm
The Court’s opinion in Loper Bright Enterprises et al. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 9:24 am
Some historians report a very limited participation in slave trading due to a prohibition of the sale of its citizens from the 16th century and an embargo on the sale of enslaved men which lasted for approximately 100 to 200 years, effectively leaving the Kingdom isolated from major political and economic changes along the coast.[22] Others state that at its height, the kingdom supplied up to 3,000 slaves a year.[23] Historian James D. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 8:43 am
(citing United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 2:00 am
The Supreme Court already removed one such guardrail in Trump v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
And time and again, those courts determined that the transactions at issue—ranging from investment opportunities in oil barrels to fishing boats to silver foxes—did in fact constitute the offer or sale of securities.[8] And then in 1946, the Supreme Court issued its seminal opinion in SEC v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 3:56 pm
The case is Solix Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 1:44 pm
Notably, each applicant must prove that the proposed project would generate new income, lodging, real property or sales taxes exceeding the amount of the awarded credit upon completion. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:55 am
The case is important as APEX and other similar private sales-channel enforcement processes become increasingly popular. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:51 am
United States. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
In Palkon v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 4:26 am
In Louisiana et al v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 4:00 am
In Transform Holdco , the United States Supreme Court resolved a split among the Circuit Courts as to whether Section 363(m) is a jurisdictional provision (i.e., depriving an appellate court of jurisdiction to hear a challenge to a sale order). [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 2:00 am
Planning & Conservation League v. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 9:54 am
In SnapRays, d/b/a SnapPower v. [read post]
