Search for: "State v. Servantes" Results 221 - 240 of 1,184
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2018, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
A certain degree of immoderation may be acceptable, particularly where it involves a reaction to what is perceived as unjustified or unlawful conduct of civil servants. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Murphy v Herfort, 428 NY2d 117, is an example of litigation resulting statements contained in communications between administrators; Missek-Falkoff v Keller, 153 AD2d 841, is an example of a case where one employee sued another employee because of the contents of a memorandum from the second employee to a superior concerning a “problem” with the coworker.As alternatives to claiming absolute immunity or qualified immunity, a public officer or employee involved in a… [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Murphy v Herfort, 428 NY2d 117, is an example of litigation resulting statements contained in communications between administrators; Missek-Falkoff v Keller, 153 AD2d 841, is an example of a case where one employee sued another employee because of the contents of a memorandum from the second employee to a superior concerning a “problem” with the coworker.As alternatives to claiming absolute immunity or qualified immunity, a public officer or employee involved in a… [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:40 am by Viking
The Army Court of Criminal Appeals issued a Memorandum Opinion on 9 December 2011, in the case of United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
Case law on the reporting on alleged irregularities in the conduct of State officials (Zakharov v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 10:01 pm
For example, a rule may be stated in language primarily applicable to a natural person and require some act or state of mind on the part of that person "himself", as opposed to his servants or agents. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 3:43 am by CMS
On 10 November 2021 the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal in Alize 1954 and Anor v Allianz Elementar Versicherungs AG and Ors [2021] UKSC 51. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 9:32 am
Dudas and the United States Patent and Trademark Office and their agents, servants, and employees are permanently enjoined from implementing the Final Rules” Notes: The court made no attempt to carve-out portions of the rules that may be legal. [read post]