Search for: "State v. Servantes"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,171
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2011, 7:40 am
The Army Court of Criminal Appeals issued a Memorandum Opinion on 9 December 2011, in the case of United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 4:18 pm
Case law on the reporting on alleged irregularities in the conduct of State officials (Zakharov v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 8:41 am
United States, 322 U. [read post]
23 May 2007, 11:43 am
State of Indiana (NFP) A.A. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 9:34 am
by Little V. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 6:29 am
Here are the materials in State of California v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:01 am
[See Prigg v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 2:35 pm
Perhaps more importantly, for the past quarter century one of those few appellate decisions has been State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 5:02 am
Haley v. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 4:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 10:01 pm
For example, a rule may be stated in language primarily applicable to a natural person and require some act or state of mind on the part of that person "himself", as opposed to his servants or agents. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 3:43 am
On 10 November 2021 the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal in Alize 1954 and Anor v Allianz Elementar Versicherungs AG and Ors [2021] UKSC 51. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 9:32 am
Dudas and the United States Patent and Trademark Office and their agents, servants, and employees are permanently enjoined from implementing the Final Rules” Notes: The court made no attempt to carve-out portions of the rules that may be legal. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:49 am
In Bivens v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:49 am
In Bivens v. [read post]
19 May 2019, 9:00 pm
[Tumey v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:49 am
In Bivens v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 4:14 am
” Judge Kelly thought it did, noting that “... the object of the official misconduct statute is to punish a breach of duty committed with the requisite culpable state of mind .... [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 11:28 am
Additional Resources: Perry v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 6:32 pm
This result the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled recently in Longaberger Company v Kolt, No 08-4432 (November 16, 2009), was appropriate "equitable relief. [read post]
