Search for: "State v. Sinclair"
Results 221 - 240
of 256
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2009, 8:09 am
w Sinclair v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 3:28 pm
In today’s case (Kelly v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 2:39 am
Subject: Library science-United States. [read post]
30 May 2009, 11:24 pm
The Case of CMS v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 3:16 am
United States v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 3:31 pm
Medinol Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
What we're doing here is the start, not the end, of relevant research.Also, if you think we didn't get your state right, please let us know. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 11:48 pm
The Constitutional Implications of Lawrence v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 6:37 am
After all, as we posted last year, the New Jersey Supreme Court in Sinclair v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:41 am
See generally Sinclair v. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 1:52 pm
" See: United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
Feb. 6, 2009) ("Guinan I"), and Guinan v. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 11:07 am
Rule 702 Expert Testimony v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Sinclair v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 1:00 pm
Essentially ignoring two New Jersey Supreme Court decisions (Rowe and Sinclair), the court applies New Jersey law to a case having nothing to do with the state (other than the defendant having shipped the product in question from New Jersey). [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:13 am
See: United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Torres, No. 072331 Sentence of 188 to 235 months for possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the court did not abuse its discretion in counting both the state drug offense and the state gun offense as contributing to defendant's status as a career offender; 2) the district court was correct in finding the state gun conviction to be a "crime of violence" for career-offender purposes; and 3) district court was compelled to… [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 10:55 am
Sinclair v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 10:21 pm
William Downey, Managing Director at W J Downey & Associates and graduate (cum laude) from the Saint Georges School of Law (1996), said, In Antigua v United States, the World Trade Organization (WTO) said the United States could restrict online gambling on sporting events, but could not prohibit offshore companies from offering online betting on horse racing. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 12:12 pm
State, 809 A.2d 77 (N.J. 2002); Landrigan v. [read post]
