Search for: "State v. Singh" Results 221 - 240 of 842
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Further to the October 19thjoint statement issued by European Commissioner for Justice, Consumers and Gender Equality Věra Jourová and U.S. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Vendirect Inc., 2018 FC 1089 https://t.co/EiP20XgtXd 2018-11-14 Computer and Internet Updates for 2018-11-14 https://t.co/ejegHQrtIO 2018-11-15 Computer and Internet Updates for 2018-11-14 https://t.co/g2XuEEAwP0 2018-11-15 'Pirate' Set-Top Boxes Used By 45% of Online Thai Consumers https://t.co/N038rmdH8k 2018-11-15 Google CEO’s China argument doesn’t hold water https://t.co/TGGFkecUyA 2018-11-15 Kendrick Lamar Denied Partial Summary Judgement in Copyright Suit… [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 10:36 am by Shubhangi Agarwalla
Labh Singh had already held that customs are subject to a fundamental rights challenge. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Great coverage of Navtej Singh Jauhar v. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 8:03 am by Andrew Hamm
Holder, by Tejinder Singh, Goldstein & Russell, P.C. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 5:44 am by HANNAH WILCE
He was successful in the High Court before Singh J, who held that the ban did bind the Crown and accordingly quashed the Secretary of State’s decision. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Timothy O’Neill discusses Timbs v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 10:47 am by Jon Levitan
Jones is not up for re-election until 2020, but he represents a deep-red state. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 6:49 am by Andrew Hamm
” For this blog, Tejinder Singh reviews Kavanaugh’s dissent in a challenge to the Affordable Care Act, Seven-Sky v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill ·         Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University ·         Ingraham v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:33 am by Jorrit Rijpma
In its earlier case law (D and Sweden v Council) on same-sex partnerships, the CJEU already ruled that these could not be equated with marriage. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
.), Attorney General Jeff Sessions stated, “I have concluded that this is a rare case where the proper course is to forgo defense of Section 5000(A)(a)” but that the decision not to defend the constitutionality of the individual mandate “will not prevent the court in Texas v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Dicta in RM (AP) (Appellant) v The Scottish Ministers (Respondent) (Scotland) (SC(Sc) [2012] 1 WLR 3386, [2012] UKSC 58 (which considered Regina v. [read post]