Search for: "State v. Spy" Results 221 - 240 of 922
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 7:22 am by familoo
And where it is the state gathering and using this material there is a pretty good chance that it isn't lawful at all (parents need not panic this applies to situations where social workers are looking at and gathering data about private individuals). [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 8:01 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The court said the plaintiffs could sue the government which placed them on the no-fly list because they would not violate their Muslim principles in refusing to serve as FBI informants to spy on their fellow Muslims. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
Cybersecurity of the Person, First Amendment Law Review, 2019, Jeff Kosseff, United States Naval Academy, Cyber Science Department. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 7:20 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
It is a case that warrants an analysis of an employee’s right to privacy and the specific types of circumstances in which an employer can use surveillance cameras to spy on workers. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:52 am by William Ford
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s ruling in Davidson v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 4:53 am by Florian Mueller
Qualcomm antitrust trial: sounds like a spy novel (at times)Overview of references to other industry players on first day of FTC v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 9:35 am by Katitza Rodriguez
The Mexican government has been denounced before for illegally spying on twenty of its most outspoken critics. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 9:35 am by Katitza Rodriguez
The Mexican government has been denounced before for illegally spying on twenty of its most outspoken critics. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 8:47 am by Cindy Cohn
Other Patent Victories: Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 6:43 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
While exposure of official police misconduct is "generally of great consequence to the public," the Second Circuit has also stated that "no authority supports the argument that reporting an alleged crime always implicates a matter of public concern," such in Nagle v. [read post]