Search for: "State v. Square"
Results 221 - 240
of 6,484
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2023, 6:27 am
Supreme Court granted a property owner’s petition for writ of certiorari in Sheetz v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Administrative law (and judicial review) was now squarely rights based. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 6:29 am
In addition, the petition argues that the Supreme Court has repeatedly stated that the private right of action in the Exchange Act should not extend beyond its boundaries. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 8:59 am
Trustee v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 4:12 am
In People v. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 8:57 am
Tsakopoulos Investments, LLC v. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 7:16 am
As the Supreme Court put it in United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
"FOIL imposes a broad duty on government agencies to make their records available to the public" citing Matter of Madeiros v New York State Educ. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
"FOIL imposes a broad duty on government agencies to make their records available to the public" citing Matter of Madeiros v New York State Educ. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
Our public squares are monitored by metal detectors and other security devices. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 6:07 am
According to plaintiffs, the LESMC "denounces capitalism, the nuclear family, and the territorial integrity of the lower 48 states of the United States[,]" and is designed "to expunge the idea of Zionism, and the legitimacy of the existence of the State of Israel, from the public square[.] [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
” Examining the Harvard Law School’s compendium of Article 51 letters, it is clear that although a number of states had filed Article 51 letters in which they cited both state and non-state actor threats, relatively few states had exclusively cited non-state actor threats in Article 51 letters filed before 2001. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:51 am
The propaganda strategy is not meant for the state apparatus of competitor states. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 10:54 am
Johnson v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am
(It also depends on whether legislatures can rescind their ratifications, as some may have done; for more on that, see Michael Stokes Paulsen's General Theory of Article V.) [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 10:47 am
Apple Inc. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:06 am
On Aug. 18, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an opinion in the long-running Marriott Data Breach MDL Litigation. [read post]
9 Sep 2023, 4:22 am
German national courts would presumably apply the Sisvel v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 5:01 am
For example, the Court stated: "To secure relief, Ms. [read post]
