Search for: "State v. Stacy" Results 221 - 240 of 254
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2023, 11:03 pm by centerforartlaw
Under the UCC, as a general rule, all types of goods held on consignment (not just art) are subject to claims of the consignee-dealer’s creditors while in the consignee’s possession unless the consignor has complied with the UCC’s requirements of publicly filing a notice stating that the consignor holds a security interest in the consigned work of art. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:33 am
  Forfeiture by wrongdoing in a principle in the common law that was first recognized by the United States Supreme Court in Reynolds v. [read post]
Emphasis on Individual Accountability to Protect the Markets To encourage a compliance culture, Associate Director Stacy Bogert stated that the SEC will seek clawbacks of executive compensation under Sarbanes-Oxley Section 304. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 5:19 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In Matter of Lynda D v Stacy C, it was held that the information before the court enables it to undertake a comprehensive independent review' of a custody or visitation issue, an evidentiary hearing is not required. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 12:19 am by Aaron Moss
I first wrote about the case two years ago, when District Judge Staci Yandle denied Take-Two’s motion for summary judgment. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 5:12 pm by Aaron Moss
Ironically, that’s the one defense that, per the Supreme Court’s recent pronouncement in Google v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 4:30 am by SHG
v=dwTQ_U3p5Wc&t=334s and scientific literature at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811917305268 or  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2489204/. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm by Jacob Fishman
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 6:11 am
This post focuses on the limitations that the ADA imposes on such testing, and concludes that the Seventh Circuit’s approach to the issue in Karraker v. [read post]