Search for: "State v. Stevens" Results 221 - 240 of 7,779
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm by Kluwer Patent blogger
Apparently it was also brought forward during the meeting of the EPO’s Administrative Council late June by various member states. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Stronski, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Tuesday, July 11, 2023 Tags: Board composition, directors, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC enforcement, Shareholder activism, universal proxy rule X Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Stronski, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Tuesday, July 11, 2023 Tags: Board composition, directors, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC enforcement, Shareholder activism, universal proxy rule X Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:54 pm by CoL .net
It would be useful to borrow from Steven Chong, J’s reading of the doctrine in BCY v BCZ, which is also a case of the Singapore High Court that applied the composite approach of Sulamerica. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Rev. 1185 (2023)) on SSRN>  Here is the abstract: A huge number of tort suits in the United States are captioned Plaintiff & Spouse v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm by Barry Barnett
A change to venue law frees state attorneys-general from involuntary transfers of antitrust actions from their home states to distant forums handling multi-district litigation involving the same subject matter. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 8:28 am by Michael Oykhman
It is sanctioned in some specific states/locations within the United States of America, but not in Canada. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 1:38 pm by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens's Six Amendments: How and Why We Should Change the Constitution. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:45 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
As stated, the rules require one intending to apply for asylum to first obtain an appointment. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:08 am
Harper:Members of this Court last discussed the outer bounds of state court review in the present context in Bush v. [read post]