Search for: "State v. Taylor"
Results 221 - 240
of 3,164
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2020, 8:00 am
Taylor v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 11:57 am
In United States v. [read post]
Removing a tenured State or municipal employee claimed to have abandonment the position from service
10 Feb 2023, 9:50 am
New York State Civil Service Rule 4 NYCRR 5.3(d), since repealed, permitted the appointing authority of a State department or agency employee to terminate a tenured employee in the Classified Service absent for a period of ten or more days without an explanation by deeming the employee to have resigned from his or her position. [read post]
Removing a tenured State or municipal employee claimed to have abandonment the position from service
10 Feb 2023, 9:50 am
New York State Civil Service Rule 4 NYCRR 5.3(d), since repealed, permitted the appointing authority of a State department or agency employee to terminate a tenured employee in the Classified Service absent for a period of ten or more days without an explanation by deeming the employee to have resigned from his or her position. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 2:13 pm
In Taylor v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 5:53 am
State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 1:09 pm
Taylor, No. 05-15088 (11th Cir. [read post]
8 Sep 2018, 5:10 am
Yesterday, the Ninth Circuit agreed with us (in Rynearson v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 9:38 am
The plaintiff in the case of English v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:59 pm
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court will delve into that question in United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 1:12 pm
State v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 3:24 pm
In Taylor v. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 7:15 am
In United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 11:53 am
Keller Williams Realty (Photo credit: Wikipedia)In Taylor et al v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 6:12 am
State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 3:15 pm
STATE v. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 4:17 am
Baze v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 8:25 am
US v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 5:19 am
In his 1995 decision for a unanimous Court in United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 7:30 pm
County Supreme Court issued a ruling on September 10 in Taylor v. [read post]